Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping Moral Motivation

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we defend a version of moral internalism and a cognitivist account of motivation against recent criticisms. The internalist thesis we espouse claims that, if an agent believes she has reason to A, then she is motivated to A. Discussion of counter-examples has been clouded by the absence of a clear account of the nature of motivation. While we can only begin to provide such an account in this paper, we do enough to show that our version of internalism can be defended against putative counter-examples. All theories of motivation which take what motivates to be a psychological state run foul of the following plausible constraint: the reason why you ought to do an action and the reason why you do it can be the same. In our view, however, while what motivates is a reason (which is a fact) the state of being motivated is a cognitive stage, viz. the belief that one has reason to act. In cases where the agent's relevant beliefs are false, then she has no reason to act, but nontheless her action can be explained in other ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Brink, D., Moral Realism and the Foundation of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancy, J., Moral Reasons. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancy, J., Why there is really No Such Thing as the Theory of Motivation, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. 95 (1995), pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C., Skepticism about Practical Reason, Journal of Philosophy, 83 (1986), pp. 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, M., Virtue as Knowledge: Objects from the Philosophy of Mind, Nous, 31(1) (1997), pp. 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J., Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. Vol. 52 (1978), pp. 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, D., Moral Vision. Oxford: Blackwell, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A., Motivation: Essentially Motivation-Constituting Attitudes, The Philosophical Review, 104(3) (1995), pp. 387–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T., The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D., Reasons and Motivation, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. Vol. 71 (1997), pp. 99–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M., The Moral Problem, Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.A.O., Internal and External Reasons, in R. Harrison (ed.), Rational Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980. Reprinted in Williams (1981), pp. 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.A.O., Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, M., Reasons for Action and Desire, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. Vol. 46 (1972), pp. 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrard, E., McNaughton, D. Mapping Moral Motivation. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1, 45–59 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009925220105

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009925220105

Navigation