Skip to main content
Log in

Why not naturalistic psychology?

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Cartwright, H. (1983).How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford Iniversity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. (1981). “Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology” InRepresentations: Philosophical Essays on the Foundations of Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: M. I. T. (Reprinted fromBehavioral and Brain Sciences. 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincaid, H. (1990). “Defending Laws in the Social Sciences.,“Philosophy of Social Science 20, forthcoming.

  • Kitcher, P. (1982). “Genes”British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33, 357–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1975). “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’.” InMind Language and Reality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staddon, J. (1983).Adaptive Behavior and Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrett, R., Graham, G. Why not naturalistic psychology?. Philosophia 20, 377–385 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02383489

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02383489

Navigation