Skip to main content
Log in

On a hitherto unexploited extension of the finitary standpoint

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

P. Bernays has pointed out that, in order to prove the consistency of classical number theory, it is necessary to extend Hilbert's finitary standpoint by admitting certain abstract concepts in addition to the combinatorial concepts referring to symbols. The abstract concepts that so far have been used for this purpose are those of the constructive theory of ordinals and those of intuitionistic logic. It is shown that the concept of a computable function of finite simple type over the integers can be used instead, where no other procedures of constructing such functions are necessary except simple recursion by an integral variable and substitution of functions in each other (starting with trivial functions).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

A bibliography of work resulting from Gödel's paper

  • Michael Beeson [1978], ‘A type-free Gödel interpretation’, J. Symbolic Logic 43, 213–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justus Diller [1968], ‘Zur Berechenbarkeit primitiv-rekursiver Funktionale endlicher Typen’, in: Contributions to Mathematical Logic, H. A. Schmidt and K. Schütte (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justus Diller [1978], ‘Functional interpretations of Heyting's arithmetic in all finite types’.

  • Justus Diller and W. Nahm [1974], ‘Eine Variante zur Dialectica-Interpretation der Heyting-Arithmetik endlicher Typen’, Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforsch. 16, 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justus Diller and Kurt Schütte [1971], ‘Simultane Rekursionen in der Theorie der Funktionale endlicher Typen’, Arch. Math. Logik Grundlagenforsch. 14, 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justus Diller and H. Vogel [1975], ‘Intensionale Funktionalinterpretation der Analysis’, in: Proof Theory Symposion Kiel 1974. J. Diller and G. H. Müller (eds.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics 500, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. G. Dragalin [1968], ‘The computation of primitive recursive terms of finite type, and primitive recursive realization,’ Zap. Naučn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov (LOMI) 8, 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Y. Girard [1971], ‘Une extension de l'interprétation de Gödel à l'analyse, et son application à l'élimination des coupures dans l'analyse et la théorie des types’, in: Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium, J. E. Fenstad (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Y. Girard [1972], ‘Interprétation fonctionnelle et élimination des coupures de l'arithmétique d'ordre supérieur’, Thèse de doctorat d'état, Université Paris VII.

  • Kurt Gödel [1958], ‘Über eine bisher noch nicht benützte Erweiterung des finiten Standpunktes’, Dialectica 12, 280–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolas D. Goodman [1976], ‘The theory of the Gödel functionals’, J. Symbolic Logic 41, 574–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Grzegorczyk [1964], ‘Recursive objects in all finite types’, Fund. Math. 54, 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Hanatani [1966], ‘Démonstration de l'ω-non-contradiction de l'arithmétique’, Ann. Japan Assoc. Philos. Sci. 3, 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Hanatani [1975], ‘Calculatability of the primitive recursive functionals of finite type over the natural numbers’, in: Proof Theory Symposion Kiel 1974, J. Diller and G. H. Müller (eds.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics 500, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 152–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Hinata [1967], ‘Calculability of primitive recursive functionals of finite type’, Sci. Rep. Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku Sect. A, 9, 218–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Hindley, B. Lercher, and J. P. Seldin [1972], ‘Introduction to Combinatory Logic’, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series 7, Cambridge U.P.

  • W. A. Howard [1968], ‘Functional interpretation of bar induction by bar recursion’, Compositio Math. 20, 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. A. Howard [1970], ‘Assignment of ordinals to terms for primitive recursive functionals of finite type’, in: Intuitionism and Proof Theory, Proceedings of the Summer Conference at Buffalo, 1968, A. Kino, J. Myhill and R. E. Vesley (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 443–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg Kreisel [1959], ‘Interpretation of analysis by means of constructive functionals of finite type’, in: Constructivity in Mathematics, A. Heyting (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 101–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg Kreisel [1965], ‘Mathematical Logic’, in: Lectures on Modern Mathematics III, T. L. Saaty (ed.), John Wiley, New York, pp. 95–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg Kreisel [1968], ‘A survey of proof theory’, J. Symbolic Logic 33, 321–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg Kreisel [1971], ‘A survey of proof theory II’, in: Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium, J. E. Fenstad (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 109–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Luckhardt [1973], ‘Extensional Gödel functional interpretation. A consistency proof of classical analysis’, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 306, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Rath [1978], ‘Eine verallgemeinerte Funktionalinterpretation der Heyting-Arithmetik endlicher Typen’, Dissertation, Münster.

  • L. E. Sanchis [1967], ‘Functionals defined by recursion, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 8, 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph R. Shoenfield [1967], ‘Mathematical Logic’, Addison-Wesley, Reading Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford Spector [1962], ‘Provably recursive functionals of analysis: a consistency proof of analysis by an extension of principles formulated in current intuitionistic mathematics’, in: Recursive Function Theory, J. C. E. Dekker (ed.), Proc. Symp. Pure Math. V, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence RI, pp. 1–27.

  • M. Stein [1977], ‘Interpretations of Heyting's Arithmetic — an analysis by means of a language with set symbols.

  • S. Stenlund [1972], Combinators, λ-terms, and proof theory, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. W. Tait [1965], ‘Infinitely long terms of transfinite type, in: Formal Systems and Recursive Functions, J. N. Crossley and M. A. E. Dummett (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 176–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. W. Tait [1967], ‘Intensional interpretations of functionals of finite type I’, J. Symbolic Logic 32, 198–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. W. Tait [1971], ‘Normal form theorem for barrecursive functions of finite type’, in: Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium, J. E. Fenstad (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 353–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. S. Troelstra [1973], ‘Realizability and functional interpretations’, in: Metamathematical Investigation of Intuitionistic Arithmetic and Analysis, A. S. Troelstra (ed.), Lecture Notes in Mathematics 344, Springer, Berlin, pp. 175–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Yasugi [1963], ‘Intuitionistic analysis and Gödel's interpretation’, J. Math. Soc. Japan 15, 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gödel, K. On a hitherto unexploited extension of the finitary standpoint. J Philos Logic 9, 133–142 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247744

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00247744

Keywords

Navigation