Skip to main content
Log in

The Meaning of Free Choice

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the distribution and interpretation of free choice items (FCIs) in Greek, a language exhibiting a lexical paradigm of such items distinct from that of negative polarity items. Greek differs in this respect from English, which uniformly employs any. FCIs are grammatical only in certain contexts that can be characterized as nonveridical (Giannakidou 1998, 1999), and although they yield universal-like interpretations in certain structures, they are not, I argue, universal quantifiers. Evidence will be provided that FCIsare indefinites; the quasi-universal effect is shown to be the result of binding by an operator with universal force. Additionally, the limited distribution of FCIs in non veridical contexts can be accounted for by analyzing them as indefinites which must always be interpreted in an intensional type. The difference between ``regular'' indefinites and FCIs, therefore, is reduced to a type difference which captures the fact that only the latter exhibit limited distribution: because of their intensional type, FCIs will be grammatical only in contexts providing alternatives (worlds or situations), and nonveridical contexts do exactly this. By contrast, FCIs are excluded from veridical and episodic contexts because these provide no alternatives and hence do not satisfy the lexical semantic requirement ofFCIs. The proposed analysis is supported by data from other languages as well (Spanish, Catalan,French) and has important consequences regarding the analysis of English any. If FCIs are not universal quantifiers but indefinites, then the usual ambiguity thesis (free choice any being universal, negative polarity any an existential) can no longer be maintained, at least not as one in terms of quantificational force.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Berman, S.: 1991, On the Semantics and Logical Form of Wh-clauses, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.: 1960, 'Linguistic Science and Linguistic Engineering', Word 16, 374–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D.: 1977, Meaning and Form. Longman, London. (Chapter 2, Any and some.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosque, I.: 1996, 'La Polaridad Modal', Ms., University of Madrid.

  • Chierchia, G.: 1995, 'Individual-level Predicates as Inherent Generics', in G. Carlson and G. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 176–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. and S. McConell-Ginet: 1991, Meaning and Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J. D.: 1981, Everything that Linguists have Always Wanted to Know about Logic (but were ashamed to ask), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Ö.: 1999, 'Review of Indefinite Pronouns by Martin Haspelmath', Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 663–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, A.: 1980, 'Any as Universal or Existential', in J. van der Auwera (ed.), The Semantics of Determiners, Croom Helm, London, pp. 11–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal, V.: 1995, 'Licensing Any in Non-negative/Non-modal Contexts', in Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) V, pp. 72–93.

  • Dayal, V.: 1997, 'Free Choice and -ever: Identity and Free Choice Readings', in Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) VII.

  • Dayal, V.: 1998, 'Any as Inherently Modal', Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 433–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Dikken, M. and A. Giannakidou: to appear, 'From Hell to Polarity: Aggressively Non-D-linked Phrases as Polarity Items', in Linquistic Inquiry.

  • Farkas, D. F.: 1992, 'On the Semantics of Subjunctive Complements', in P. Hirschbühler and K. Körner (eds.), Romance Languages and Modern Linguistic Theory, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 69–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Fintel, K.: 1994, Restrictions on Quantifier Domains, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Fintel, K.: 1999, 'NPI-Licensing, Strawson-Entailment, and Context-Dependency', Journal of Semantics 16, 97–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Fintel, K.: 2000, 'Whatever', in Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) X.

  • Geurts, B.: 1999, Presupposition and Pronouns, Elsevier, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A.: 1995, 'Subjunctive, Habituality and Negative Polarity', in Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) V, pp. 132–150.

  • Giannakidou, A.: 1997a, The Landscape of Polarity Items, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen.

  • Giannakidou, A.: 1997b, 'Linking Sensitivity to Limited Distribution: The Case of Free Choice', in P. Dekker et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, pp. 139–145.

  • Giannakidou, A.: 1998, Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A.: 1999, 'Affective Dependencies', Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 367–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A.: 2000, 'Negative... Concord?', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 457–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou, A. and F. Zwarts: 1999, 'Temporal, Aspectual Operators and (Non)Veridicality', to appear in A. Giorgi, J. Higginbotham, and F. Pianesi (eds.), The Syntax and Semantics of Tense and Mood Selection, Oxford University Press.

  • Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1984, Studies in the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

  • Haspelmath, M.: 1997, Indefinite Pronouns., Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I. and A. Kratzer: 1998, Semantics in Generative Grammar, Blackwell.

  • Hintikka, J.: 1962, Knowledge and Belief: an Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J.: 1990, 'Exploring Exception Phrases', in M. Stokhof and L. Torenvliet (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Amsterdam Colloquium, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam, pp. 165–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R: 1972, On the Semantic Properties of Logical Operators in English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.

  • Horn, L. R.: 1999, 'Any and (-)ever. Free Choice and Free Relatives', Proceedings of IATL [Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics] 15, 71–111. Published 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R.: 2000, 'Pick a Theory: Not Just Any Theory', in L. Horn and Y. Kato (eds.), Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 147–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R. and Y.-S. Lee: 1995, 'Diagnosing the Diagnostics', Ms., Yale University.

  • Israel, M.: 1996, 'Polarity Sensitivity as Lexical Semantics', Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 619–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, P.: 1995, 'The Quantificational Force of English Free Relatives', in Bach et al. (eds.), Quantification in Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 451–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon, N. and F. Landman: 1993, 'Any', Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 353–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H.: 1978, 'Semantics versus Pragmatics', in F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt (eds.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 255–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L.: 1977, 'Syntax and Semantics of Questions', Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiparksy, P. and C. Kiparsky: 1971, 'Fact', in D. Steinberg and L. Jacobovits (eds.), Semantics, Cambridge University Press, pp. 345-369.

  • Kratzer, A.: 1981, 'On the Notional Category of Modality', in H. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser (eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 38–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1995, 'Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates', in G. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, Chicago University Press, Chicago, pp. 125–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M., F. J. Pelletier, G. Carlson, A. ter Meulen, G. Chierchia, and G. Link: 1995, 'Genericity: An Introduction', in G. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, W. A.: 1979, Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw,W. A.: 1986, 'Principles of Semantic Filtering', in Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 5.

  • Ladusaw, W. A.: 1996, 'Negation and Polarity Items', in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford. pp. 321–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.: 1997,' Negative Polarity and Free Choice: Where Do They Come from?', in P. Dekker et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, pp. 217–222.

  • Lee, Y.-S. and L. R. Horn: 1994, 'Any as an Indefinite Plus Even', Ms., Yale University.

  • LeGrand, J. E.: 1975, Or and Any: The semantics and Syntax of Two logical Operators, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.

  • Lin, J.-W.: 1996, Polarity Licensing and Wh-phrase Quantification in Chinese, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linebarger, M.: 1980, The Grammar of Negative Polarity, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Linebarger, M.: 1987, 'Negative Polarity and Grammatical Representation', Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 325–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, J.: 2000, 'Antecedent Contained Deletion in Negative Polarity Items', Syntax 3, 134–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quer, J.: 1998, Mood at the Interface, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utrecht.

  • Quer, J.: 1999, 'The Quantificational Force of Free Choice Items', Ms., University of Amsterdam.

  • Quer, J.: 2000, 'Licensing Free Choice Items in Hostile Environments: The Role of Aspect and Mood', Ms., University of Amsterdam.

  • Quine, W. van Orman: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B.: 1987, 'Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-shifting Principles', in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Progovac, L.: 1994, Negative and Positive Polarity, Cambridge University Press.

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1947, Elements of Symbolic Logic, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rullmann, H.: 1996, 'Two Types of Negative Polarity Items', in Proceedings of Northeastern Linguistics Society (NELS) 26.

  • Sæbø, K.-J.: this issue, 'The Semantics of Scandinavian Free Choice Items'.

  • Tovena, L.: 1999, The Fine Structure of Polarity Items, Garland, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovena, L. and J. Jayez: 1997, 'The Modal Arbitrariness of Any', Ms., University of Geneva and EHESS, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tredinnick, V.: 1996, 'On the Interpretation and Distribution of - Ever in English Free Relatives', Proceedings of CONSOLE 4.

  • Vikner, C.: 1999, 'Episodic and Habitual Temporal Connectives in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish', NORDSEM Report, University of Copenhagen.

  • Zwarts, F.: 1986, Categoriale Grammatica en Algebraische Semantiek. Een studie naar negatie en polariteit in het Nederlands, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen.

  • Zwarts, F.: 1995, 'Nonveridical Contexts', Linguistic Analysis 25, 286–312.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Giannakidou, A. The Meaning of Free Choice. Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 659–735 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012758115458

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012758115458

Keywords

Navigation