Skip to main content
Log in

Disparate goods and Rawls' difference principle: A social choice theoretic treatment

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rawls' Difference Principle asserts that a basic economic structure is just if it makes the worst off people as well off as is feasible. How well off someone is is to be measured by an ‘index’ of ‘primary social goods’. It is this index that gives content to the principle, and Rawls gives no adequate directions for constructing it. In this essay a version of the difference principle is proposed that fits much of what Rawls says, but that makes use of no index. Instead of invoking an index of primary social goods, the principle formulated here invokes a partial ordering of prospects for opportunities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Plott, Charles R.: 1978, ‘Rawls' theory of justice: An impossibility result’, in Hans W. Gottinger and Werner Leinfellner (eds.), Decision Theory and Social Ethics: Issues in Social Choice (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John: 1974, ‘Reply to Alexander and Musgrave’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, pp. 633–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John: 1975, ‘A Kantian conception of equality’, Cambridge Review, pp. 94–99.

  • Rawls, John: 1977, ‘The basic structure as subject’, American Philosophical Quarterly 14, pp. 159–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibbard, A. Disparate goods and Rawls' difference principle: A social choice theoretic treatment. Theor Decis 11, 267–288 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126381

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126381

Keywords

Navigation