Abstract
The paper is an exploration for a conceptual framework for cross-cultural interfacing. The roots of this exploration lie in my personal, functional, social and cultural experiences, and cross-cultural encounters. These encounters in many ways reflect the networking journey of AI & Society, promoting and stimulating the human-centred debate in cross-cultural settings. As a ‘cross-cultural holon’, AI & Society has been questioning the given orthodoxy of the ‘one best way’ and the culture of the ‘exact language’ since its inception 21 years ago. My observation is that even though we now live in a world of multimodal interactive media technologies, some how the interface design has not moved much beyond the functional (observed reality) worldview of our interactions. Even at the functional level, the design perspective remains bounded by the observed reality. It is thus no surprise that when it comes to designing interaction technologies for social and cultural domains such as health care, work, employment, life long learning, the design mainly hovers around the functional skill training, mechanical feedback and objectified evaluation. When we move beyond the functional worldview, and explore our interactions within social and cultural domains, we encounter both the reality (objectified world) and actuality (experienced world) of interactions. At this level, the challenge of the interface is not just coping with the interaction spaces of reality and actuality but also with the ‘in-between’ space of actuality–reality gaps. We explore how the concept of symbiosis enables the interaction in the gaps between actuality and reality, how the concept of the ‘culture of the artificial enables the sharing and pooling experiences, how the concept of valorisation’ enables to find a coherence (commonality) between interactions, and how the concept of cultural holon is used to conceptualise the network architecture of cross-cultural interactions. It is proposed that the way forward to designing cross-cultural interfaces is to first seek a conceptual framework for cross-cultural interaction spaces, and then use this framework to design interfacing systems and tools.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cooley MJ (1991) Architect or Bee?: the human price of technology. The Hogarth Press, London
Gill KS (ed) (1996) Human machine symbiosis. Springer, London
Gill KS (2002) The user in the emerging space of the digital provide. In: Proceedings of the conference on the user’s models in the advanced society, Venice University IUAV (Venice University Institute of Architecture), 18–19 November
Gill KS (2006) The dance of the user in the artificial cultural space. In: Negrotti M, Satofuka F (eds) Yearbook of the artificial. Peter Lang, Bern
Gill SP (1995) Dialogue and tacit knowledge for knowledge transfer. PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge
Koestler A (1989) The ghost in the machine. Arkana Books, London
Mathews J (1995) Holonic organisational architectures. Hum Syst Manage 15:113–124
Negrotti M (1999) The theory of the artificial. Intellect Books, Exeter
Rosenbrock HH (1990) Machines with a purpose. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Uchiyama K (2003) The theory and practice of actuality. Institute of Business research, Daito Bunka University, Tokyo, pp 175–8571
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gill, K.S. Rethinking the cross-cultural interaction architecture. AI & Soc 21, 639–647 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0102-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0102-9