Skip to main content
Log in

In Defense of a Non-Causal Account of Reasons Explanations

  • Published:
The Journal of Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper defends my claim in earlier work that certain non-causal conditions are sufficient for the truth of some reasons explanations of actions, against the critique of this claim given by Randolph Clarke in his book, Libertarian Accounts of Free Will.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. That a desire's causing an action (in the right sort of way) can be enough to make the desire a reason for which the agent acted (without the agent's having an intention about the desire) is shown most clearly, perhaps, by cases where the agent lacks the concepts necessary to have an intention (or any other propositional attitude) about a desire, as would, e.g. a pre-lingual infant or an animal. Clarke mentions such cases: "… it is not evidently impossible that an agent act on a certain desire and yet lack the concept of a desire an hence be incapable of having the sort of second-order intention in question" (Clarke 2003, p. 23).

References

  • Clarke, R. 2003. Libertarian accounts of free will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Davidson, D. 1963. Actions, reasons, and causes. The Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginet, C. 1989. Reasons explanation of action: an incompatibilist account. Philosophical Perspectives 3, 17–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginet, C. 1990. On action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginet, C. 2002. Reasons explanations of action: causalist versus noncausalist accounts. In The Oxford handbook of free will, ed. R. Kane, 386–405. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • McCann, H. 1998. The works of agency. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A. 2003. Motivation and agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Ginet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ginet, C. In Defense of a Non-Causal Account of Reasons Explanations. J Ethics 12, 229–237 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-008-9033-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-008-9033-z

Keywords

Navigation