Summary
It is shown how the historiographic purport of Lakatosian methodology of mathematics is structured on the theme of analysis and synthesis. This theme is explored and extended to the revolutionary phase around 1800. On the basis of this historical investigation it is argued that major innovations, crucial to the appraisal of mathematical progress, defy reconstruction as irreducibly rational processes and should instead essentially be understood as processes of social-cognitive interaction. A model of conceptual change is developed whose essential ingredients are the variability of rational responses to new intellectual and practical challenges arising in the cultural environment of mathematics, and the shifting selective pressure of society. The resulting view of mathematical development is compared with Kuhn's theory of scientific paradigms in the light of some personal communications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crosland, M.: 1967,The Society of Arcueil. A View of French Science at the Time of Napoleon I, London.
Descartes, R.: 1637, (trans. Smith & Latham),The Geometry, with a Facsimile of the First Edition, New York, 1954.
Dhombres, J.: 1980, ‘L'enseignement des mathématiques par la méthode révolutionnaire’,Revue d'histoire des sciences XXXIII, 315–348.
Glas, E.: 1983, ‘Bio-science between Experiment and Ideology’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 14, 39–57.
Glas, E.: 1986, ‘On the Dynamics of Mathematical Change in the case of Monge and the French Revolution’, ibid.17, 249–268.
Glas, E.: 1988, ‘Between Form and Function: Social Issues in Mathematical Change’,Philosophica 42, 21–41.
Glas, E.: 1989a,b, ‘Testing the Philosophy of Mathematics in the History of Mathematics’, Part I,Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 20, 115–131; Part II,ibid.: 157–174.
Glas, E.: 1991,De Mathematisering van Natuur, Techniek en Samenleving, Leuven, Apeldoorn.
Grabiner, J. V.: 1981, ‘Changing Attitudes toward Mathematical Rigor’, in Jahnke & Otte (1981), pp. 311–330.
Grattan-Guinness, I.: 1981, ‘Mathematical Physics in France 1800–35’, in Jahnke & Otte (1981), pp. 349–370.
Hall, A. R.: 1980,Philosophers at War. The Quarrel Between Newton and Leibniz, Cambridge.
Hintikka, J. and Remes, U.: 1974,The Method of Analysis. Its Geometrical Origin and Its General Structure, Dordrecht.
Jahnke, H, N. and Otte, M. (eds.): 1981,Epistemological and Social Problems of the Sciences in the Early Nineteenth Century, Dordrecht.
Kitcher, P.: 1984,The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge, New York.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1962,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1970, ‘Reflections on my Critics’, in Lakatos & Musgrave (1970), pp. 231–278.
Kuhn, T. S.: 1983, ‘Rationality and Theory Choice’,Journal of Philosophy LXXX, 563–570.
Lagrange: 1788,Mécanique analytique, Paris.
Lakatos, I.: 1978a (Worrall, J. & Currie, G. eds.),The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Philosophical Papers Vol. 1., Cambridge.
Lakatos, I.: 1978b (Worrall, J. & Currie, G. eds.),Mathematics, Science and Epistemology. Philosophical Papers Vol. 2, Cambridge.
Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.): 1970,Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge.
Laplace, P. S.: 1796, ‘Exposition du système du monde’, inOeuvres complètes, Paris, 1878–92, tome VI.
Monge, G.: 1809,Application d'analyse à la Géométrie, nouvelle éd., Paris.
Monge, G.: 1811–12,Géométrie descriptive, nouvelle éd., Paris.
Nagel, E.: 1939, ‘The Formation of Modern Conceptions of Formal Logic in the Development of Geometry’,Osiris VII, 142–222.
Ovaert, J. L. and Sansuc, J. J. (eds.): 1976,Philosophie et calcul de l'infini, Paris.
Paul, M.: 1980,Gaspard Monges “Géométrie descriptive” und die Ecole polytechnique, Bielefeld.
Sherry, D.: 1987, ‘The Wake of Berkeley's Analyst: Rigor Mathematicae?’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 18, 455–480.
Taton, R.: 1951,L'oeuvre scientifique de Monge, Paris.
Toulmin, S.: 1972,Human Understanding, Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glas, E. Mathematical progress: Between reason and society. J Gen Philos Sci 24, 235–256 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764388
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00764388