Skip to main content
Log in

The Evolution of a Scientific Concept

  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A philosophically comprehended account is given of the genesis and evolution of the concept of protein. Characteristic of this development were not shifts in theory in response to new experimental data, but shifts in the range of questions that the available experimental resources were fit to cope with effectively. Apart from explanatory success with regard to its own range of questions, various other selecting factors acted on a conceptual variant, some stemming from a competing set of research questions, others from an altogether different field of inquiry, and still others from the external environment. These results are best explained on, hence support, an evolutionary model of the progress of experimental investigation, whose outlines are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bechtel, W.: 1984, “The evolution of our understanding of the cell.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15, 309–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berzelius, J. J.: 1843, Jahresberichte 22, 535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleitmann, T.: 1847, “Ueber die Existenz eines schwefelfreien Proteins.” Annalen der Chemie und der Pharmacie 61, 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florkin, M.: 1972- 86, A History of Biochemistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, A.: 1986, The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fruton, J. S.: 1972, Molecules and Life. New York: WileyInterscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas, E.: 1979, Chemistry and Physiology in their Historical and Philosophical Relations. Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glas, E.: 1983, “Bioscience between experiment and ideology.” Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 14, 39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, T.: 1861, “Anwendung der Diffusion der Flüssigkeiten zur Analyse.” Ann. Chem. Pharm. 121, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1983, Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, F. L.: 1963, “Elementary analysis and the origins of physiological chemistry.” Isis 54, 50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N.: 1991, The Scenes of Inquiry: On the Reality of Questions in the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, R. E.: 1971, “The background of Eduard Buchner's discovery of cellfree fermentation.” Journal of the History of Biology 4, 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, R. E.: 1972, “The reception of Eduard Buchner's discovery of cellfree fermentation.” Ibid. 5, 171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, H. E. (ed.): 1990, Experimental Inquiries. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, C. G.: 1849- 52, Lehrbuch der physiologischen Chemie. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebig, J.[1840]: 1965, “Ueber das Studium der Naturwissenschaften.” In: Reden und Abhandlungen, Carriere, M. and Liebig, G. (eds.). Neudruck Wiesbaden, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebig, J.: 1841, “Ueber die stickstoffhaltigen Nahrungsmittel des Pflanzenreichs”. Ann. Chem. Pharm. 38, 203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebig, J. [1842]: 1964, Animal Chemistry, or Organic Chemistry in its Application to Physiology and Pathology. Facsimile with an introduction by F. L. Holmes. New York and London: Johnson reprint corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebig, J.: 1844, “Berzelius und die Probabilitätstheorien.” Ann. Chem. Pharm. 50, 334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebig, J. [1844]: 1965, “Bemerkungenüber das Verhältnis der Thierchemie zur Thierphysiologie.” In: Reden und Abhandlungen, op.cit., p. 70.

  • Liebig, J. [1865]: 1965, “Induction und Deduction.” In: Reden und Abhandlungen, op.cit., p. 300.

  • Marchand, R. F.: 1844, Lehrbuch der physiologischen Chemie. Berlin: Simion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, G. J.: 1843- 50, Proeve eener algemeene physiologische scheikunde. Rotterdam: Kramers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nägeli, C.: 1879, Theorie der Gährung. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflüger, E.: 1875, “Beiträge zur Lehre von der Respiration.” Pflügers Archiv der gesamten Physiologie 10, 251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glas, E. The Evolution of a Scientific Concept. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 30, 37–58 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008246507186

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008246507186

Navigation