Abstract
A philosophically comprehended account is given of the genesis and evolution of the concept of protein. Characteristic of this development were not shifts in theory in response to new experimental data, but shifts in the range of questions that the available experimental resources were fit to cope with effectively. Apart from explanatory success with regard to its own range of questions, various other selecting factors acted on a conceptual variant, some stemming from a competing set of research questions, others from an altogether different field of inquiry, and still others from the external environment. These results are best explained on, hence support, an evolutionary model of the progress of experimental investigation, whose outlines are briefly discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bechtel, W.: 1984, “The evolution of our understanding of the cell.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15, 309–356.
Berzelius, J. J.: 1843, Jahresberichte 22, 535.
Fleitmann, T.: 1847, “Ueber die Existenz eines schwefelfreien Proteins.” Annalen der Chemie und der Pharmacie 61, 121.
Florkin, M.: 1972- 86, A History of Biochemistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Franklin, A.: 1986, The Neglect of Experiment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fruton, J. S.: 1972, Molecules and Life. New York: WileyInterscience.
Glas, E.: 1979, Chemistry and Physiology in their Historical and Philosophical Relations. Delft: Delft University Press.
Glas, E.: 1983, “Bioscience between experiment and ideology.” Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 14, 39–57.
Graham, T.: 1861, “Anwendung der Diffusion der Flüssigkeiten zur Analyse.” Ann. Chem. Pharm. 121, 4.
Hacking, I.: 1983, Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, F. L.: 1963, “Elementary analysis and the origins of physiological chemistry.” Isis 54, 50.
Jardine, N.: 1991, The Scenes of Inquiry: On the Reality of Questions in the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kohler, R. E.: 1971, “The background of Eduard Buchner's discovery of cellfree fermentation.” Journal of the History of Biology 4, 35.
Kohler, R. E.: 1972, “The reception of Eduard Buchner's discovery of cellfree fermentation.” Ibid. 5, 171.
Le Grand, H. E. (ed.): 1990, Experimental Inquiries. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Lehmann, C. G.: 1849- 52, Lehrbuch der physiologischen Chemie. Leipzig: Engelmann.
Liebig, J.[1840]: 1965, “Ueber das Studium der Naturwissenschaften.” In: Reden und Abhandlungen, Carriere, M. and Liebig, G. (eds.). Neudruck Wiesbaden, p. 23.
Liebig, J.: 1841, “Ueber die stickstoffhaltigen Nahrungsmittel des Pflanzenreichs”. Ann. Chem. Pharm. 38, 203.
Liebig, J. [1842]: 1964, Animal Chemistry, or Organic Chemistry in its Application to Physiology and Pathology. Facsimile with an introduction by F. L. Holmes. New York and London: Johnson reprint corporation.
Liebig, J.: 1844, “Berzelius und die Probabilitätstheorien.” Ann. Chem. Pharm. 50, 334.
Liebig, J. [1844]: 1965, “Bemerkungenüber das Verhältnis der Thierchemie zur Thierphysiologie.” In: Reden und Abhandlungen, op.cit., p. 70.
Liebig, J. [1865]: 1965, “Induction und Deduction.” In: Reden und Abhandlungen, op.cit., p. 300.
Marchand, R. F.: 1844, Lehrbuch der physiologischen Chemie. Berlin: Simion.
Mulder, G. J.: 1843- 50, Proeve eener algemeene physiologische scheikunde. Rotterdam: Kramers.
Nägeli, C.: 1879, Theorie der Gährung. München: Oldenbourg.
Pflüger, E.: 1875, “Beiträge zur Lehre von der Respiration.” Pflügers Archiv der gesamten Physiologie 10, 251.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glas, E. The Evolution of a Scientific Concept. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 30, 37–58 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008246507186
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008246507186