Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Operationalizing evil: Christian realism, liberal economics, and industrial agriculture

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Enlightenment marked a shift inmoral debates away from notions of sin and eviltoward the more secular concept of virtue basedin reason. Perhaps the most notable example ofsuch liberal thought can be found in JohnDewey's 1934 A Common Faith, where he arguesthat people should set aside bickering overreligious differences and work in a utilitarianspirit to achieve public good through science.Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Soviet Union, theChinese cultural revolution, and the Cold War'sthreat of mutually assured destruction haveinspired philosophers and theologians to revivethe concept of evil to explain atrocities tooextreme to be incorporated into conventionalunderstandings of virtue and reason. In theirstruggle to explain the enormity of humancapacities for destruction, they have replacedtraditional religious definitions of evil witha more secular one: the construction anddefense of a systemic contempt for life.Assuming that bad consequences are simply theunintended result of good intentions, socialscientists have resisted employing such aconception of evil. Persisting in thisassumption may prevent us from seeing theperversity of the liberal economicjustification for promoting and perpetuatingdestructive tendencies in the industrialagricultural system. This paper seeks tooperationalize a conception of evil and toapply it to policy debates surrounding the 1985Food Security Act in the hope of evaluating oursociety's inability to resolve social andenvironmental consequences generated byindustrial agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amy, D. J. (1987). “Can policy analysis be ethical?” In F. Fischer and J. Forester (eds.), Confronting Values in Policy Analysis: The Politics of Criteria (pp. 45–69). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: The Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, K. (1968 [1932]). The Epistle to the Romans. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batie, S. S. (1985). “Soil conservation in the 1980s: A historical perspective.” In D. Helms and S. L. Flader (eds.), The History of Soil and Water Conservation. Washington, DC: The Agricultural History Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, G. (1994). Essays in Critical Theology. Kansas City: Sheed & Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, A. (1998). “Liberal democracy in the global era: Implications for the agro-food sector.” Agriculture and Human Values 15(3): 223–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, W. P. (1988). Private Interests, Public Policy, and American Agriculture. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (2000). The Eclipse of Morality: Science, State, and Market. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (1989). “Irony, tragedy, and temporality in agricultural systems, or, how values and systems are related.” Agriculture and Human Values6(4): 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constance, D. H., J. L. Gilles, and W. D. Heffernan (1990). “Agrarian policies and agricultural systems in the United States.” In A. Bonanno (ed.), Agrarian Policies and Agricultural Systems. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittendon, A. (1980). “Soil Erosion Threatens U.S. Farm Output.” New York Times, 26 October: A-1.

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1975). Conflict and Contract: Industrial Relations and the Political Community in Times of Crisis. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danbom, D. B. (1979). The Resisted Revolution: Urban American and the Industrialization of Agriculture, 1900-1930. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1935). Liberalism and Social Action. New York: G. P. Putnam's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). A Common Faith. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, J. S. (1997). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford: The Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, K. M. (1996). “The problem of community in rural America.” Culture and Agriculture 18(2): 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1965). The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, J. W. Swain (trans.). London: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fite, G. C. and J. E. Reese (1965). An Economic History of the United States. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenna, L. (2002). “Liberal economics and the institutionalization of sin: Christian and stoic vestiges in economic rationalism.” Worldviews: Environment, Culture, and Religion6: 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenna, L. (1999). “Systemic constraints to ecological wellbeing: The case of the 1985 Food Security Act.” Rural Sociology 64(1): 131–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics, J. J. Shapiro (trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, D. (1990). “New authorities and new roles: SCS and the 1985 Farm Bill.” In T. L. Napier (ed.), Implementing the Conservation Title of the Food Security Act of 1985. Ankeny, Iowa: Soil Conservation Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, P. C. (1989). God in History: Shapes of Freedom. Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M. and T. W. Adorno (1999 [1944]). Dialectic of Enlightenment, J. Cumming (trans.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • House Committee on Agriculture (1984). Long-Term Farm Policy to Succeed the Agriculture and Food Act of 1981. Parts I thru V. Washington, DC: USGPO. Chair: E. (Kika) de la Garza (D), Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • House Subcommittee on Department Operations, Research, and Foreign Agriculture (1982). Sustainable Agriculture Systems. Washington, DC: USGPO. Chair: George E. Brown, Jr. (D), California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huszar, P. C. and J. E. Young (1984). “Why the great Colorado plowout?” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (July- Aug.) 39(4): 232–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Economic Committee (1985). The Economic Evolution of Agriculture. Washington, DC: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Economic Committee and the Subcommittee on Agriculture and Transportation (1983). Toward the Next Generation of Farm Policy. Parts I thru III. Washington, DC: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Economic Committee and the Subcommittee on Agriculture and Transportation, Staff Study (1984). Towards the Next Generation of Farm Policy. Washington, DC: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintz, L. (1997). Between Jesus and the Market: The Emotions That Matter in Right-Wing America. Durham, North Carolina/ London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (2001). “Hearts and heads.” New York Times, Op-ed, p. 22, April.

  • Krugman, P. (1994). Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in the Age of Diminished Expectations. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, G. (1985). Theology for a Nuclear Age. Manchester: Manchester University Press/Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. and J. Urry (1987). The End of Organized Capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learner, M. (1996). Politics of Meaning: Restoring Hope and Possibility in an Age of Cynicism. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1964). One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moody-Adams, M. (1997). Fieldwork in Familiar Places: Morality, Culture, and Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, P. H. (1986). “The political economy of credit in American agriculture.” Rural Sociology 51(4): 449–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, T. L. (1990). “The conservation title of the Food Security Act of 1985: An Overview.” In T. Napier (ed.), Implementing the Conservation Title of the Food Security Act of 1985. Ankeny, Iowa: Soil Conservation Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1953). Christian Realism and Political Problems. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1952). The Irony of American History. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1932). Moral Man and Immoral Society. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) (1982). Impacts of Technology on United States Cropland and Productivity. Washington, DC: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1950). The Open Society and its Enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinn, T. (1998). “False connections: Systems and action theories in neofunctionalism and in Jurgen Habermas.” Sociological Theory 16(1): 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senate Subcommittee on Soil and Water Conservation, Forestry, and Environment (1984). Legislative Proposals Linking Commodity and Conservation Programs. Washington, DC: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senate Subcommittee on Soil and Water Conservation, Forestry, and Environment (1984). Regional Soil and Water Conservation Needs. Washington, DC: USGPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellenbarger, S. and J. H. Birnbaum (1983). “Lost exports: Long U.S. dominance in world grain trade Is slowly diminishing.” Wall Street Journal, 19 May: 1, 27.

  • Smith, A. (1976). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. D. D. Raphael and A. L. MacFie (eds.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoor, M. (1997). “Introduction.” In M. Spoor (ed.), The ‘Market Panacea': Agrarian Transformation in Developing Countries and Former Socialist Economies. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taff, S. J. and C. F. Runge (1987). “Supply control, conservation, and budget restraint: Conflicting instruments in the 1985 Farm Bill.” In D. W. Halback, C. F. Runge, and W. E. Larson (eds.), Making Soil and Water Conservation Work. Ankeny, Iowa: Soil Conservation Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. B. (1997). “Communication, education, and the problem of trust.” In Food Biotechnology in Ethical Perspective (pp. 216–240). London: Blackie Academic and Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences, Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch (trans. and eds.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggershaus, R. (1994). The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories, and Political Significance, M. Robertson (trans.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1992). Rediscovering the Sacred: Perspectives on Religion in Contemporary Society. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, H. (1988). “The Sociology of Science.” In N. J. Smelser (ed.), Handbook of Sociology (pp. 511–574). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rural Sociology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

    Leland Glenna

Authors
  1. Leland Glenna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glenna, L. Operationalizing evil: Christian realism, liberal economics, and industrial agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 19, 205–216 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019985003236

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019985003236

Search

Navigation