Abstract
In our paper we aim at reflecting upon the extent to which educational theory may be used as a framework in the analysis of policy documents. As policy texts are ‘heteroglossic in character’ (Lingard and Ozga, in The Routledge Falmer reader in education policy and politics, Routledge, London and New York, 2007, p. 2) and create “circumstances in which the range of options available in deciding what to do are narrowed or changed” (Ball in, Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J Ball, Routledge, London and New York, 2006, p. 46), they need to be theoretically tackled in their underlying assumptions and implications. This proposal draws on an analysis of two sets of documents of the European Union: texts produced between 2000 and 2006, underlying the European Union programmes; and texts produced by a working group focusing on the key competences of Lifelong Learning (2003–2006). Initially, the framework for the analysis of different documents was grounded on the existing research in the field of educational policy. Now we attempt a secondary analysis of the collected data by transposing the borders of this particular and highly prolific field. We argue that what is outside the texts may reshape what is inside the texts. Educational theory allows us to define some conceptual tools in order to question the documents as political apparatus which open and constrain possibilities. Therefore, we will use educational theory as an arena where different matters, perspectives and possibilities may be explored and assembled. We have engaged in a conversation with both the data and some theoretical approaches. Central to this conversation are the concepts of “ignorant schoolmaster” (Rancière, in The ignorant schoolmaster five lessons in intellectual emancipation, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1991), “learning contexts” (Edwards, in Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching, Routledge, Oxon and New York, 2009a, b), and “experience” (Larrosa, in Revista Brasileira de Educação, 19:20–28, 2002).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This project was funded by the Portuguese Ministry of Science and Technology (reference: PTDC/CED/60425/2004) and was developed across the period 2007–2009. See http://moodle.fct.unl.pt/course/view.php?id=1226.
Our translation from the Portuguese edition.
References
Alves, M. G., & Azevedo, N. R. (2010). Investigar em Educação: desafios da construção de conhecimento e da formação de investigadores num campo multi-referenciado. Caparica: Edições UIED.
Alves, M. G., Neves, C., & Gomes, E. X. (2010). Lifelong Learning: Conceptualizations in European educational policy documents. European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 332–344.
Ball, S. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J Ball. London and New York: Routledge.
Bernstein, B. (2001). Das pedagogias aos conhecimentos. Educação, Sociedade e Culturas, 15, 9–17.
Biesta, G. (2005). Against learning. Reclaiming a language for education in a time of learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 25(1), 54–66.
Biesta, G. (2006). What’s the point of lifelong learning if lifelong learning has no point? European Educational Research Journal, 5, 169–180.
Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, Co: Paradigm Publishers.
Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (1997). Cognition, complexity and teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 105–125.
Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations: 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Edwards, R. (2009a). Introduction: Life as a learning context? In R. Edwards, G. Biesta, & M. Thorpe (Eds.), Rethinking contexts for learning and teaching (pp. 1–13). Oxon and New York: Routledge.
Edwards, R. (2009b). Materialising theory: Does theory matter? Keynote Symposium: The theory question in education. BERA Anual Conference. Resource document. The Stirling Institute of Education. https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/dspace/index.jsp.
Falk, C. (1999). Sentencing learners to life: Retrofitting the academy for the information age. Theory, Technology and Culture, 22(1–2), 19–27.
Gil, J. (2004). Portugal, Hoje: o medo de existir. Lisboa: Relógiod’Água.
Jörg, T. (2009). Thinking in complexity about learning and education: a programmatic view. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 6(1), 1–22.
Larrosa, J. (1999). Dar a ler, dar a pensar…quem sabe. Entre literatura e filosofia. In W. Kohan & B. Leal (Eds.), Filosofia para Crianças em Debate (pp. 119–129). Vozes: Rio de Janeiro.
Larrosa, J. (2002). Notas sobre a experiência e o saber de experiência. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 19, 20–28.
Lather, P. (1992). El posmodernismo y las políticas de ilustración. Revista de Educación, 297, 7–24.
Latour, B. (2006). O Poder da crítica. Mangualde: Edições Pedago.
Lingard, B., & Ozga, J. (2007). Introduction: Reading education policy and politics. In B. Ligard & J. Ozga (Eds.), The Routledge Falmer reader in education policy and politics (pp. 1–8). London and New York: Routledge.
Martínez Bonafé, J. (1996). Pedagogías críticas. Poder y conciencia. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, 253, 78–81.
Musil, R. (2008). O Homem sem qualidades. Lisboa: Publicações D. Quixote.
Osberg, D., Biesta, G., & Cilliers, P. (2008). From representation to emergence: Complexity’s challenge to the epistemology of schooling. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 213–227.
Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster five lessons in intellectual emancipation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rancière, J. (2008). The misadventures of critical thinking. In Criticism of contemporary Issues—International Conferences 2007. Porto: Fundação Serralves.
St.Pierre, E. A. (2004). Deleuzian concepts for education: The subject undone. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3), 283–296.
Young, M. (2010). Alternative educational futures for a knowledge society. European Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 1–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonçalves, T.N.R., Gomes, E.X., Alves, M.G. et al. Theory and Texts of Educational Policy: Possibilities and Constraints. Stud Philos Educ 31, 275–288 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9294-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9294-7