Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics'

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Barth, E. M., and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue, De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F. H. van. and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eemeren, F. H. van and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J.: forthcoming, ‘Cicero's Authority’, in Proceedings of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, 1999. CD-ROM, St. Catherines, Ontario.

  • Kauffeld, F. J.: 1995, ‘On the Difference between Assumptions and Presumptions’, in S. Jackson (ed.), Argumentation and Values: Proceedings of the Ninth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, Speech Communication Association, Falls Church, pp. 509-515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, F. J.: 1998, ‘Presumptions and the Distribution of Argumentative Burdens in Acts of Proposing and Accusing’, Argumentation 12, 245-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, M.: 1999, ‘Rhetorical Prolepsis and the Dialectical Tier of Argumentation’, in Proceedings of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation Conference, 1998, Sic Sat, Amsterdam, pp. 510-513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D.: 1998, The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willard, C. A.: 1983, Argumentation and the Social Grounds of Knowledge, University of Alabama Press, University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagar, I. Z.: 1995, ‘Argumentation in Language Opposed to Argumentation with Language: Some Problems’, in F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair and C. A. Willard (eds.), Reconstruction and Application.Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Argumentation, Vol III, Sic Sat, Amsterdam, 5C, pp. 200-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagar, I. Z.: 1998, ‘Polyphony in the Theory of Argumentation in the Language-System: What it is and How it Works’, in James F. Klumpp (ed.), Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and Critiques: Proceedings of the Tenth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, National Communication Association, Annandale, pp. 80-84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, 1815 Chicago Avenue, Evanston, IL, 60208, U.S.A

    Jean Goodwin

Authors
  1. Jean Goodwin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodwin, J. Comments on `Rhetoric and Dialectic from the Standpoint of Normative Pragmatics'. Argumentation 14, 287–292 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007805130030

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007805130030

Keywords

Search

Navigation