Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toward an International Rule of Law: Distinguishing International Law-Breakers from Would-Be Law-Makers

  • Published:
The Journal of Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An interesting fact about customary international law is that the only way you can propose an amendment to it is by breaking it. How can that be differentiated from plain law-breaking? What moral standards might apply to that sort of international conduct? I propose we use ones analogous to the ordinary standards for distinguishing civil disobedients from ordinary law-breakers: would-be law-makers, like civil disobedients, must break the law openly; they must accept the legal consequences of doing so; and they must be prepared to have the same rules applied to them as everyone else.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert E. Goodin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodin, R.E. Toward an International Rule of Law: Distinguishing International Law-Breakers from Would-Be Law-Makers. J Ethics 9, 225–246 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-004-3327-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-004-3327-6

Keywords

Navigation