Abstract
The most immediate reason why chemists are unenthusiastic about the philosophy of science is the historic hostility of important philosophers, to the concept of atoms. (Without atoms, discovery in chemistry would have proceeded with glacial slowness, if at all, in the last 200 years.) Other important reasons include the anti-realist influence of the philosophical dogmas of logical positivism, instrumentalism, of strict empiricism. Though (as has been said) these doctrines have recently gone out of fashion, they are still very influential.
A diagram of the methodology of experimental research is proposed, in the form of a flow sheet, with feedback. The model is developed as a multi-level expansion of a diagram of the hypothetico-deductive model. It recognizes that strong mutual support, or interlocking, of research endeavors is important, at the underlying level of levels where explanatory causation contributes to scientific understanding. (Mutual support at the laboratory level is generally weak or trivial.) The multiplicity of explanatory levels, and the interlocking, point to solutions to some well-known problems, such as the origin of the hypotheses, and even a resolution to the underdetermination problem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. Achinstein and S.F. Barker, The Legacy of Logical Positivism, Johns Hopkins Press, 1969.
J. Agassi, Michael Faraday as a Natural Philosopher. University of Chicago Press, 1971.
J.L. Aronson, R. Harré and Eileen C. Way, Realism Rescued: How Scientific Progress is Possible. Open Court, Chicago, IL, 1995.
F. Bacon, Novum Organum (1628).
R.M. Blake, C.J. Ducasse and E.H. Madden, Theories of the Scientific Method: The Renaissance through the 19th Century. University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1960.
R. Boyd, P. Gasper and J.D. Trout, eds., The Philosophy of Science. MIT Press, 1991; Indroduction, pp. xi–xiv; R. Boyd, p. 7 and pp. 349–377; Glossary, pp. 774–781.
S.G. Brush, Transmuted Past: The Age of the Earth and the Evolution of the Elements. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
R.E. Butts and J.W. Davis, eds., The Methodological Heritage of Newton. University of Toronto, 1970, p. 137.
E.F. Caldin, The Structure of Chemistry in Relation to the Philosophy of Science. Sheed and Ward, London & New York, 1961.
R.A.G. Dolby, Uncertain Knowledge. Cambridge, University Press, 1996.
S. Drake, The Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo. Doubleday, 1957.
P. Duhem, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (1906, 1914), translated by P. Wiener, Princeton University Press, 1954.
H. Feigl, The Origin and Spirit of Logical Positivism, in: P. Achinstein and S.F. Barker, eds., The Legacy of Logical Positivism. Johns Hopkins Press, 1969.
R.N. Giere, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. University of Chicago Press, 1988.
R.J. Good, Search and Research. Chemtech 10: 100–109, Feb. 1980.
Ian Hacking, Representing and Intervening. Cambridge University Press, 1983.
N.R. Hanson, Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge University Press, 1958.
N.R. Hanson, Hypothesis Fingo, in: R.E. Butts and J.W. Davis, eds. The Methodological Heritage of Newton. University of Toronto, 1970, pp. 14–33.
S. Harding, ed., Can Theories by Refuted?, Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis, D. Reidel, Dordrecht-Holland, 1976. See especially chapters by Grunbaum, by Quine, and by Hesse.
G. Harman, Skepticism and the Definition of Knowledge. Garland Publishing Co., New York, 1990.
R. Harré, The Principles of Scientific Thinking. University of Chicago Press, 1970.
R. Harré, The Philosophies of Science. Oxford University Press, 1972.
Rom Harré, personal communication, 1997.
J.F.W. Herschel, A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy, Longman's London, 1830; Johnson Reprint Corp., NY and London, 1966. The 46-page Introduction to the reprint, by M. Partridge, is worth study.
M. Hesse, Models and Analogies in Science. University of Notre Dame Press, 1960.
M.B. Hesse, Positivism and the Logic of Scientific Theories, in: P. Achinstein and S.F. Barker, eds., The Legacy of Logical Positivism. Johns Hopkins Press, 1969.
M. Hesse, The Structure of Scientific Inference. University of California Press, 1974.
G. Holton, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Harvard, 1973.
G. Holton, Galileo Against the Philosophers (1605 and 1606) translated by Stillman Drake, Zeitlin & Verbrugge, Los Angeles, 1976.
G. Holton, Times Literary Supplement, London 2: 1231–1234, November, 1984.
G. Holton, Science and Anti-Science. Harvard University Press, 1994.
D. Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748). Open Court, Chicago, 1927.
J.R. Josephson and S.G. Josephson, Abductive Inference. Cambridge University Press, 1994.
T.S. Knight, C.S. Peirce. Twayne Publishers, Inc., Washington Square Press, NY, 1965, pp. 116–119.
Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, 1962; 2nd ed., 1970.
L. Laudan, Science of Hypothesis. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, 1981.
J. Losee, A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press, 1972.
J. Losee, Philosophy of Science and Historical Inquiry. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987.
E. Mach, Die Mechanik in ihres Entwiklung (5th ed.), 1904, translated by T. M. McCormick, as The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account. Chicago, 1960.
S.H. Mauskopf, ed., Chemical Sciences in the Modern World. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993.
E. McMullin, The Inference that Makes Science. Marquette University Press, Milwaukee, 1992.
P. Medawar, Is the Scientific Paper Fraudulent? The Listener: 377, Sept. 12, 1963, The Saturday Review of Literature: 42, Aug. 1, 1964.
P. Medawar, Pluto's Republic. Oxford University Press, 1989.
J.S. Mill, System of Logic, 8th ed. Harper & Brothers, NY, 1874.
W.H. Newton-Smith, The Rationality of Science. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1981.
M.J. Nye, Molecular Reality: A perspective on the Scientific Work of Jean Perrin. Macdonald & Co., London, and American Elsevier, NY, 1972.
C.S. Peirce, The Collected Papers of Charles Saunders Peirce, C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss eds. Vol. 5, Harvard Univ. Press, 1931–1935.
J.R. Platt, Science 146: 347, 1964.
J.R. Platt, The Step to Man. Wiley, 1966.
K. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Basic Books, 1959, First edition, in German, 1934.
W. v O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View. Harvard, 1953.
O. Sacks, Hidden Histories of Science. NY Review of Books, R.B. Silver, ed., 1975.
W.G. Salmon, Foundations of Scientific Inference. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1957.
J.W. Servos, Physical Chemistry from Ostwald to Pauling. Princeton University Press, 1990, p. 81.
S. Shapin, The Scientific Revolution. University of Chicago Press, 1996.
V.E. Smith, Science and Philosophy. Bruce Publishing Co., Milwaukee, 1965.
G. Stent, Scientific American, December, 1972.
C.J. Suckling, K.E. Suckling and C.W. Suckling, Chemistry through Models. Cambridge University Press, 1978.
A. Thackray, Atoms and Powers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1970. The reference to Newton and ‘transdiction’ is on p. 14.
P. Thagard, Computational Philosophy of Science. MIT Press, 1988.
P. Thagard, Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton University Press, 1992.
B. Van Fraassen, The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press, 1980.
A.G. Van Melsen, From Atmos to Atom, translated by H.G. Koren. Duquesne University Press, 1952.
S. Weinberg, Dreams of a Final Theory. Vintage Books, 1993.
S. Weinberg, Nature 386: 213–215, 1997.
John Archibald Wheeler, At Home in the Universe. American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY, 1994.
W. Whewell, The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. J.W. Parker, London, 1847.
W. Whewell, The History of the Inductive Sciences. J.W. Parker, London, 1857.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Good, R.J. Why are Chemists ‘Turned Off’ by Philosophy of Science?. Foundations of Chemistry 1, 65–95 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009931623309
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009931623309