References
Brandon, R. and R. Burian: 1984,Genes, Organisms and Populations: Controversies Over the Units of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Coyne, J., H. Orr and D. Futuyma: 1988, ‘Do We Need A New Species Concept?’,Systematic Zoology 37, 190–200.
Ereshefsky, M.: 1992,Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kitcher, P.: 1984, ‘Against the Monism of the Moment: A Reply to Elliott Sober's,Philosophy of Science 51, 616–630.
Kitcher, P.: 1986, ‘Bewitchment of the Biologist’,Nature 320, 649–650.
Kitcher, P.: 1987, ‘Ghostly Whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and the “Philosophers” on the Ontological Status of Species’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 184–192.
Mishler, B. and R. Brandon: 1987, ‘Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 397–414.
Sober, E.: 1984, ‘Sets, Species, and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitchers' “Species”’,Philosophy of Science 51, 334–341.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grantham, T.A. Beyond “individuality” and “pluralism”: A review of Ereshefsky'sUnits of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species . Biol Philos 8, 457–468 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857691
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857691