Skip to main content
Log in

Deliberative Democracy and Emotional Intelligence: An Internal Mechanism to Regulate the Emotions

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deliberative democracy, it is claimed, is essential for the legitimisation of public policy and law. It is built upon an assumption that citizens will be capable of constructing and defending reasons for their moral and political beliefs. However, critics of deliberative democracy suggest that citizens’ emotions are not properly considered in this process and, if left unconsidered, present a serious problem for this political framework. In response to this, deliberative theorists have increasingly begun to incorporate the emotions into their accounts. However, these accounts have tended to focus only upon the inclusion of emotions in the external-collective exchange of reason between citizens. Little work has been done on how the individual will actually cope with emotions internally within their own minds. There has been no consideration of the capacities that citizens will need to perceive, understand and regulate emotions as they formulate reasons both by themselves and with others. Moreover, there has been little consideration of how these capacities might be educated in children so that emotionally competent deliberative citizens can be created. In this paper, emotional intelligence is presented as an essential capacity that can fulfil this role for the deliberative citizen and deliberative democracy more generally. The ‘deliberative school’ is suggested as a potential site for this transformation that can progress from generation to generation, cultivating citizens that are increasingly better equipped to handle emotionally-laden deliberative engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thoughts and action. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. L. (2006). All kids are our kids: What communities must do to raise caring and responsible children and adolescents (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2007). Education and the democratic person: Towards a political conception of democratic education. Teacher’s College Record, 109(3), 740–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society: Education, life long learning and the politics of citizenship. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. J. J., & Lawy, R. S. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy: Overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (2005). Democracy and cultural pluralism. Political Theory, 23(2), 253–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (Eds.) (1998). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

  • Chambers, S. (1996). Reasonable democracy: Jurgen Habermas and the politics of discourse (pp. 17–34). Ithica: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberative and democratic legitimacy. In A. Hamlin & P. Petit (Eds.), The good polity. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlin, J. (2009). The American past: A survey of American history. Boston: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1995). Descartes error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1910) [2009]. How we think. South Carolina: Bibliolife Open Source Press.

  • Dryzek, J. (Ed.). (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (Ed.). (1998). Deliberative democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, C., Isen, A., & Young, M. (1997). Positive affect facilitates integration of information and decreases anchoring in reasoning among physicians. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Procedures, 72, 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J., & Laslett, P. (2003). Debating deliberative democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fortenbaugh, W. (1977). Aristotle on emotion. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, F. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (2006). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

  • Giroux, H. (2001). Theory and resistance in education: Towards a pedagogy for the opposition. Connecticut: Greenwood Press.

  • Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. (2003). Reflective democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Gross, J. (1999). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2, 271–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. (1987). Democratic education. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

  • Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Massachusetts: Belknapp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1971). Toward a rational society. Massachusetts: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1995). Between facts and norms. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. (2006). “Deliberative democracy and the public use of passion,” 9a-10. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Marriott, Loews Philadelphia, and the Pennsylvania Convention Center, Philadelphia, PA, Aug 31, 2006, http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p150587_index.html. Accessed on December 4, 2009.

  • Hatzimoysis, A. (2009). Philosophy and the emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbing, J., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M. L. (1984). Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy. In C. E. Izard., J. Kagan, R. B. Zajonc (Eds.), Emotions, cognition and behaviour (pp. 103-131). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hume, D. (1739) [2004]. A treatise of human nature. London: Penguin.

  • Hume, D. (1751) [2008]. An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. Toronto: Bastian Books.

  • Isen, A., & Daubman, K. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A., Daubman, K., & Nowicki, G. (1987). Positive effect facilitates problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A., & Means, B. (1983). The influence of positive affect on decision making strategy. Social Cognition, 2, 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A., Rosenzweig, A., & Young, M. (1991). The influence of positive affect on clinical problem solving. Moral Decision Making, 11, 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. (1989). Love and knowledge: Emotion in feminist epistemology. Inquiry, 32(2), 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, B., & Isen, A. (1993). The influence of positive effect on variety seeking among safe enjoyable products. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785) [2002]. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.

  • Krause, S. (2005). Desiring justice: Motivation and justification in Rawls and Habermas. Contemporary Political Theory, 4, 363–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, S. (2008). Civil passions. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafrancois, D., & Ethier, M.-A. (2010). Translating the ideal of deliberative democracy into democratic education: Pure Utopia? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(3), 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research, 78, 178–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, S. (1995). The essential curriculum for pupils exhibiting emotional and behaviour difficulties. Therapeutic Care and Education, 4, 36–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E. (2002). The sentimental citizen. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E., & Mackuen, M. (1993). Anxiety, enthusiasm and the vote: Emotional underpinnings of learning and involvement during presidential campaigns. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 688–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. (1999). Personality and the search for success [book review of Seymour Epstein’s constructive thinking: The key to emotional intelligence]. Contemporary Psychology: The APA Review of Books, 44, 467–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J., & Cobb, C. D. (2000). Educational policy on emotional intelligence: Does it make sense? Educational Psychology Review, 12(2), 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J.D., & Geher, G. (1996). Emotional intelligence and the identification of emotion. Intelligence, 22, 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J., & Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence, 17, 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J., & Salovey, P. (1997). What is emotional intelligence? In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development an emotional intelligence (pp. 3–31). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. D., & Stevens, A. (1994). An emerging understanding of the reflective (meta-) experience of mood. Journal of Research in Personality, 28, 351–373. (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynor, J. (2003). Republicanism in the modern world. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, E. (1990). Skillstreaming in early childhood: Teaching prosocial skills to the preschool and kindergarten child. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moos, R. (1991). Connections between school, work and family settings. In B. Fraser & H. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (1999). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Social Research, 66(3), 745–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2006). Political soul-making and the imminent demise of liberal education. Journal of Social Philosophy, 37(2), 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. (2002). The rhetoric of deliberation: Some problems in kantian theories of deliberative democracy. Res Publica, 8(3), 249–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzaro, D. (2000). Nothing more than feelings? The role of emotions in moral judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(4), 355–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qualter, P., Gardner, K. J., & Whitely, H. E. (2007). Emotional intelligence: Review of research and educational implications. Pastoral Care in Education, 25(1), 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice: Revised edition. Massachusetts: Belknapp Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remer, G. (2002). Two models of deliberation: Oratory and conversation in ratifying the constitution. Journal of Political Philosophy, 8(1), 68–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolls, E. (1999). The brain and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., Hsee, C., & Mayer, J. (1993). Emotional intelligence and the self-regulation of affect. In D. M. Wegner & J. W. Pennebaker (Eds.), Handbook of mental control (pp. 258–277). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Ladd, B., & Chan, C. (2004). Emotional intelligence and participation in decision making: Strategies for promoting organizational learning and change. Strategic Change, 13, 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & Macgregor, D. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristic and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, R., Newman, R., & McLain, T. (1994). Self-regulation of mood: Strategies for changing a bad mood, raising energy and reducing tension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(5), 910–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S., & Hoggett, P. (2001). The emotional dynamics of deliberative democracy. Policy and Politics, 29(3), 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its Use. Harpers Magazine, 140, 227–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weale, A. (2004). Contractarian theory, deliberative democracy and general agreement. In K. Dowding, R. Goodin, C. Pateman & B. Barry (Eds.), Justice and democracy: Essays for Brian Barry (pp. 79–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Weare, K., & Gray, G. (2003). What works in developing children’s emotional and social competence and well-being? London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement, motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 549–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 120–135). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 670–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., Roberts, R. D., & Matthews, G. (2002). Can emotional intelligence be schooled? A critical review. Educational Psychologist, 37, 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Derek Bell and Peter Jones for discussing the topic of this paper on numerous occasions and for making very helpful comments on previous drafts. I am also grateful to Ian O’ Flynn, Graham Long, Albert Weale and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martyn Griffin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffin, M. Deliberative Democracy and Emotional Intelligence: An Internal Mechanism to Regulate the Emotions. Stud Philos Educ 31, 517–538 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-011-9283-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-011-9283-2

Keywords

Navigation