Abstract
In 1977, David Malament proved the valuable technical result that the simultaneity relation of standard synchrony \(\epsilon=\frac{1}{2}\) with respect to an inertial observer O is uniquely definable in terms of the relation κ of causal connectibility. And he claimed that this definability undermines my own version of the conventionality of metrical simultaneity within an inertial frame.
But Malament’s proof depends on the imposition of several supposedly “innocuous” constraints on any candidate for the simultaneity relation relative to O. Relying on Allen I. Janis’s 1983 challenge to one of these constraints, I argue that Malament’s technical result did not undermine my philosophical construal of the ontological status of relative metrical simultaneity. Furthermore, I show that (a) Michael Friedman’s peremptorily substantivalist critique of my conception, which Malament endorses, is ill-founded, and (b) if Malament had succeeded in discrediting my own conventionalist version of metrical simultaneity, he would likewise have invalidated Einstein’s pioneering version of it.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Malament, D.: Causal theories of time and the conventionality of simultaneity. Noûs 11, 293–300 (1977)
Jammer, M.: Hans Reichenbach und der Begriff der Gleichzeitigkeit. In: Poser, H., Dirk, U. (eds.) Hans Reichenbach: Philosophie Im Umkreis der Physik. Akademie Verlag, Berlin (1998)
Friedman, M.: Simultaneity in Newtonian mechanics and special relativity. In: Earman, J., Glymour, C., Stachel, J. (eds.) Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 8, pp. 403–432. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1977)
Reichenbach, H.: Axiomatization of the Theory of Relativity. University of California Press, Berkeley (1969)
Grünbaum, A.: Simultaneity by slow clock transport in the special theory of relativity. Philos. Sci. 36(1), 9–11 (1969)
Grünbaum, A.: Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, 2nd edn. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 12, pp. 684–685, 686, 688. Reidel, Dordrecht (1973). The chapter from which these passages are drawn (Chap. 20) was reprinted from [5]
Stein, H.: On relativity theory and the openness of the future. Philos. Sci. 58, 147–167 (1991)
Einstein, A.: Zur Elektrodynamik Bewegter Körper. In: Stachel, J. (ed.) The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein, vol. 2, pp. 277–279. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1989)
Einstein, A.: Relativity. The Special and The General Theory, 15th edn. Methuen, London (1954). Trans. by R.W. Lawson. Enlarged. Chap. 8. I am greatly indebted to Robert Rynasiewicz for steering me to this reference, which I had forgotten
Janis, A.: Simultaneity and conventionality. In: Cohen, R., Laudan, L. (eds.) Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis, Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum, pp. 101–110. Reidel, Dordrecht (1983). Esp. pp. 107–108
Grünbaum, A.: Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. Knopf, New York (1963)
Winnie, J.: The causal theory of space-time. In: Earman, J., Glymour, C., Stachel, J. (eds.) Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 8, pp. 192–193. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1977)
Einstein, A.: Autobiographical notes. In: Schilpp, P.A. (ed.) Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. Library of Living Philosophers, Evanston (1949)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grünbaum, A. David Malament and the Conventionality of Simultaneity: A Reply. Found Phys 40, 1285–1297 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9328-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-009-9328-3