Abstract
It is argued that the social significance of nanotechnologies should be understood in terms of the politics and ethics of uncertainty. This means that the uncertainties surrounding the present and future development of nanotechnologies should not be interpreted, first and foremost, in terms of concepts of risk. It is argued that risk, as a way of managing uncertain futures, has a particular historical genealogy, and as such implies a specific politics and ethics. It is proposed, instead, that the concepts of contingency and of finitude must be central to any understanding of the ethical significance of nanotechnologies, as these concepts can be used to understand the basis of recent work in science and technology studies, and the sociology of knowledge more widely, which details the multi-dimensional social nature of technological uncertainty.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
On how the BSE crisis demonstrated the unrealistic nature of policy-makers’ expectations of scientific advice, see Adam [1]: 164–91.
References
Adam B (1998) Timescapes of modernity: the environment and invisible hazards. Routledge, London
Adam B, Groves C (2007) Future matters: action, knowledge, ethics. Leiden, Brill
Aitken RJ, Chaudhry MQ et al (2006) Manufacture and use of nanomaterials: current status in the UK and global trends. Occup Medicine-Oxford 56(5):300–306. doi:10.1093/occmed/kql051
Allianz AG (2007) Small sizes that matter. Allianz AG, Munich
Amato I (1999) Nanotechnology: shaping the world atom by atom. National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology, Washington DC
Andorno R (2004) The precautionary principle: a new legal standard for a technological age. J Int Biotechnol Law 1(1):11–19. doi:10.1515/jibl.2004.1.1.11
Anton P, Silberglitt R et al (2001) The global technology revolution: bio/nano/materials trends and their synergies with information technology by 2015. RAND, (Santa Monica, CA
Arnall A, Parr D (2004) Moving the nanoscience and technology (NST) debate forwards: short-term impacts, long-term uncertainty and the social constitution. In: Nanotechnologies: a preliminary risk analysis. European Commission. Retrieved 10/04/08 from http://europa.eu.int/comm/health/ph_risk/events_risk_en.htm
Barry A (2001) Political machines: governing a technological society. Athlone, London
Bauman Z (2005) Liquid life. Polity Press, Cambridge
Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage Publications, London
Beck U (1996) Wissen oder Nicht-Wissen? Zwei Pespektiven reflexiver Modernisierung. In: Beck U, Giddens A, Lash S (eds) Reflexive Modernisierung. Frankfurt a. M., Suhrkamp, pp 289–315
Beck U (2005) Power in the global age: a new global political economy. Polity, Cambridge
Bernstein P (1996) Against the Gods: the remarkable story of risk. Chichester, Wiley
Brown N, Michael M (2003) A sociology of expectations: retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 15(1):3–18. doi:10.1080/0953732032000046024
Calkins DR, Dixon RL et al (1980) Identification, characterization and control of potential human carcinogens: a framework for federal decision-making. J Natl Cancer Inst 64:169–176
Chhabra R, Sharma J et al (2006) Addressable molecular tweezers for DNA-templated coupling reactions. Nano Lett 6(5):978–983. doi:10.1021/nl060212f
Dannreuther C, Lekhi R (2000) Globalization and the political economy of risk. Rev Int Polit Econ 7(4):574–594. doi:10.1080/096922900750034554
de S. Cameron NM (2006) Nanotechnology and the human future: policy, ethics, and risk. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1093:280–300. doi:10.1196/annals.1382.019
Downey GL (1995) The world of industry-university-government: reimagining R&D as America. In: Marcus GE (ed) Technoscientific imaginaries: conversations, profiles and memoirs. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 197–226
Drexler KE (2006) Nanotechnology: From Feynman to Funding. In: Hunt G, Mehta MD (eds) Nanotechnology: Risk, Ethics and Law. Earthscan, London, pp 25–34
Dupuy JP (2007) Some pitfalls in the philosophical foundations of nanoethics. J Med Philos 32(3):237–261. doi:10.1080/03605310701396992
ETC Group (2003) The big down: from Genomes to Atoms
ETC Group (2005) Nanotech’s “Second Nature” patents: implications for the Global South
Feenberg A (1999) Questioning technology. London, Routledge
Fischer F (2005) Are scientists irrational? Risk assessment in practical reason. In: Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) Science and citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement. Zed Books, London, pp 54–65
Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1990) Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Gavelin K, Wilson R et al (2007) Democratic technologies? The final report of the Nanotechnology Engagement Group (NEG). London, Involve
Gross M (2007) The unknown in process - dynamic connections of ignorance, non-knowledge and related concepts. Curr Sociol 55:742–759
Hacking I (1990) The taming of chance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hacking I (1986) Culpable ignorance of interference effects. In: MacLean D (ed) Values at risk. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa NJ, pp 136–154
Hansson SO (1996) Decision making under great uncertainty. Philos Soc Sci 26:369–386. doi:10.1177/004839319602600304
Hansson SO (2000) Seven myths of risk. Stockholm thirty years on. Paper presented at Progress achieved and challenges ahead in international environmental co-operation, Swedish Ministry of the Environment, 17–18 June 2000
Hansson SO (2002) Uncertainties in the knowledge society. Int Soc Sci J 54(1):39. doi:10.1111/1468-2451.00357
Hansson SO (2004) Weighing risks and benefits. Topoi-an Int Rev Philos 23:145–152
Hegel GWF (2004) Science of logic. Routledge, London
Herrick C, Jamieson D (1995) The social construction of acid rain. Glob Environ Change 5(2):105–112. doi:10.1016/0959-3780(95) 00016-H
Horlick-Jones T (2000) Towards a non-reductionistic risk analysis. ESRC End of Award Report L211272006.
Hunt G (2006) The global ethics of nanotechnology. In: Hunt G, Mehta MD (eds) Nanotechnology: risk, ethics and law. London, Earthscan, pp 183–195
International Centre for Technology Assessment (ICTA) (2008) Principles for the oversight of nanotechnologies and nanomaterials. Retrieved 13/03/08 from http://www.icta.org/doc/Principles%20for%20the%20Oversight%20of%20Nanotechnologies%20and%20Nanomaterials_finalwJan08sigs.pdf
Jasanoff S (2005) Let them eat cake: GM foods and the democratic imagination. In: Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) Science and citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement. Zed Books, London, pp 183–198
Jones R (2004) Soft machines: nanotechnology and life. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kaiser M (1997) The precautionary principle and its implications for science. Found Sci 9:201–105. doi:10.1023/A:1009641701933
Kass LR (ed) (2003) Beyond therapy: biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. President’s Council on Bioethics, Washington DC
Kearnes M (2006) Chaos and control: nanotechnology and the politics of emergence. Paragraph 29(2):57–80. doi:10.3366/prg.2006.0014
Kearnes M, Grove-White R et al (2006) From bio to nano: learning lessons from the UK agricultural biotechnology controversy. Sci Cult 15(4):291–307. doi:10.1080/09505430601022619
Kearnes M, Macnaghten P et al (2006) Governing at the nanoscale: people, policies and emerging technologies. Demos, London
Kearnes M, Wynne B (2007) On nanotechnology and ambivalence: the politics of enthusiasm. Nanoethics 1:131–142. doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0014-7
Keulartz J, Schermer M et al (2004) Ethics in technological culture: a programmatic proposal for a pragmatist approach. Sci Technol Human Values 29(3):3–29. doi:10.1177/0162243903259188
Klamer A, Leonard TC (1994) So what's an economic metaphor? In: Mirowski P (ed) Natural images in economic thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 20–54
Knight FH (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA
Lemley MA (2005) Patenting nanotechnology. Stanford Law Rev 58(2):601–630
Lopez J (2004) Bridging the gaps: science fiction in nanotechnology. Hyle 10(2):129–152
Macoubrie J (2006) Nanotechnology: public concerns, reasoning and trust in government. Public Underst Sci 15:221–241. doi:10.1177/0963662506056993
Marchant GE (2003) From general policy to legal rule: aspirations and limitations of the precautionary principle. Environ Health Perspect 111(14):1799–1803
Marris P (1996) The politics of uncertainty: attachment in private and public life. Routledge, London; New York
Meyer G, Folker AP et al (2005) The factualization of uncertainty: risk, politics, and genetically modified crops—a case of rape. Agric Human Values 22(2):235–242. doi:10.1007/s10460-004-8283-z
National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) (2006) Environmental, health and safety research needs for engineered nanoscale materials. National Nanotechnology Coordination Office, Arlington, VA
Nelkin D (1975) The political impact of technical expertise. Soc Stud Sci 5:35–54. doi:10.1177/030631277500500103
O'Neill J, Holland A et al (2008) Environmental values. Routledge, Abingdon
Peterson M (2007) On multi-attribute risk analysis. In: Lewens T (ed) Risk: philosophical perspectives. Routledge, London, pp 68–83
Pidgeon N, Rodgers-Hayden T (2007) Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’? Health Risk Soc 9(2):191–210. doi:10.1080/13698570701306906
Plutowski U, Jester SS et al (2007) DNA-based self-Sorting of nanoparticles on gold surfaces. Adv Mater 19(15):1951–1956. doi:10.1002/adma.200602169
Powell MC (2007) New risk or old risk, high risk or no risk? How scientists' standpoints shape their nanotechnology risk frames. Health Risk Soc 9(2):173–190. doi:10.1080/13698570701306872
Puchner EM, Kufer SK et al (2008) Nanoparticle self-assembly on a DNA-Scaffold written by single-molecule cut-and-paste. Nano Lett 8(11):3692–3695. doi:10.1021/nl8018627
Ravetz JR (1993) The sin of science: ignorance of ignorance. Knowledge: creation, diffusion. Utilization 15(12):157–165
Renn O, Roco MC (2006) Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. J Nanopart Res 8(2):153–191. doi:10.1007/s11051-006-9092-7
Rip A (2006) The tension between fiction and precaution in nanotechnology. In: Fisher E, Jones J, von Schomberg R (eds) Implementing the precautionary principle: perspectives and prospects. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 270–283
Roco MC (2004) Nanoscale science and engineering: unifying and transforming tools. AIChE J 50(5):890–897. doi:10.1002/aic.10087
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2001) Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Springer
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS (2003) Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/London
Rose N (1999) The powers of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rose N (2001) The politics of life itself. Theory Cult Soc 18(1):1–30. doi:10.1177/02632760122051607
Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 7:385–403. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
Schummer J (2001) Ethics of chemical synthesis. Hyle 7(2):103–124
Stirling A (2007) Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy debate. EMBO Rep 8(4):309–315. doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400953
Tallacchini M (2004) Before and beyond the precautionary principle: epistemology of uncertainty in science and the law. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 197(3):646–651
Throne-Holst H, Stø E (2008) Who should be precautionary? Governance of nanotechnology in the risk society. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 20(1):99–112. doi:10.1080/09537320701726726
UK Government (2003) The future of air transport. London, Department for Transport
Uskokovic V (2007) Nanotechnologies: what we do not know. Technol Soc 29(1):43–61. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2006.10.005
Vaidhyanathan S (2006) Nanotechnologies and the law of patents: a collision course. In: Hunt G, Mehta MD (eds) Nanotechnology: risk, ethics and law. Earthscan, London, pp 225–236
Walker WE, Harremoës P et al (2003) Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assess 4(1):5–17. doi:10.1076/iaij.4.1.5.16466
Webster A (2004) Risk, science and policy: researching the social management of uncertainty. Policy Stud 25(1):5–15. doi:10.1080/0144287042000208206
Wolff J (2006) Risk, fear, shame, blame and the regulation of public safety. Econ Philos 22(3):409–427. doi:10.1017/S0266267106001040
Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning - reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environ Change 2(2):111–127
Wynne B (2002) Risk and environment as legitimatory discourses of technology: reflexivity inside out? Curr Sociol 50(3):459–477. doi:10.1177/0011392102050003010
Wynne B (2005) Risk as globalizing 'democratic' discourse? Framing subjects and citizens. In: Leach M, Scoones I, Wynne B (eds) Science and citizens: globalization and the challenge of engagement. Zed Books, London, pp 66–82
Žižek S (1989) Tarrying with the negative: Kant, Hegel and the critique of ideology. Duke University Press, Durham
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Groves, C. Nanotechnology, Contingency and Finitude. Nanoethics 3, 1–16 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-009-0057-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-009-0057-z