Skip to main content
Log in

Social Research in the Advancement of Children's Rights

Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article argues that investigators doing developmental and social research with children have, for the most part, failed to acknowledge the inherent implications of their work for children's rights. The impact of these studies upon children's rights occurs at every stage; from hypothesis formulation to hypothesis testing to dissemination of findings. This paper addresses the issue in the context of developmental research on children's ability to report experienced events accurately. This particular research area has generated data that has been extrapolated to legal contexts and created a foundation for assumptions about the credibility of child witnesses. This in turn has had profound effects on children's right to be heard and the weight given to their testimony. The argument is made that there is a need for social scientists to explicitly articulate how their work may impact upon children's rights and what is in fact the social agenda in this regard underlying their research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Bentz, V.M. and Shapiro, J.J. (1998). Mindful Inquiry. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, B.L., Goodman, G.S., Schwartz-Kenny, B.M. and Thomas, S.N. (2002). Understanding children's use of secrecy in the context of eyewitness reports, Law and Human Behavior 26 (3), 286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, J.L. (2002). Why chance is a good theory, American Psychologist 57 (1) 66–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camparo, L.B., Wagner, J.T. and Saywitz, K.J. (2001). Interviewing children about real and fictitious events: Revisiting the narrative elaboration procedure, Law and Human Behavior 25 (1), 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Foundation for Children, Youth and the Law v Canada (Attorney General) (2000). Ont. ACJ Docket No. C34749.

  • Cole, M. and Means, B. (1981). Comparative Studies of How People Think. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallam, S., Cepeda-Benito, A., Kraemer, H.C., Gleaves, D.H., Silberg, J. and Spiegel, D. (2001). The effects of child sexual abuse: Comment on Rind, Tromovitch and Bauserman (1998), Psychological Bulletin 127 (6), 715–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S.L. and Bottoms, B.L. (2002). Effects of social support on children's eyewitness reports: A test of the underlying mechanism, Law and Human Behavior 26 (2), 185–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulaney, D.E. (1974). On the support of cognitive theory in opposition to behavior theory: A methodological problem. InW.B. Weimer and D.S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the Symbolic Processes (pp. 43–56), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton v. Brant County Board of Education (1997). 1 S.C.R., 241.

  • Eaton v. Brant County Board of Education (1995). 123 D.L.R. (4th), 43.

  • Eaton v. Brant County Board of Education (1994). 71 O.A.C., 69.

  • Ekman, P. (1985). Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics and Marriage. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1989). Why lies fail and what behaviors betray a lie. In J. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility Assessment (pp. 71–82), Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S.C. (2002a). Whatever happened to Canadian children's equality rights? A reconsideration of the Eaton special education case, Education and the Law 14 (4), 253–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S.C. (2002b). On power differentials and children's rights: A dissonance interpretation of the Rind and associates (1998) study on child sexual abuse, Ethical Human Sciences and Services: An International Journal of Critical Inquiry 5 (1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G.B. and Wilcox, B.L. (2001). Children's law: Toward a new realism, Law and Human Behavior 25 (1), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ondersma, S.J., Berliner, L., Chaffin, M., Cordin, I., Goodman, G.S. and Barnett, D. (2001). Sex with children is abuse: Comment on Rind, Tromvitch, and Bauserman (1998), Psychological Bulletin 127 (6), 707–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orcutt, H.K., Goodman, G.S., Tobey, A.E., Batterman-Faunce, J. and Thomas, S. (2001). Detecting deception in children's testimony: Fact-finders' abilities to reach truth in open and closed circuit trials, Law and Human Behavior 25 (4), 339–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipe, M.E. and Wilson, J.C. (1994). Cues and secrets: Influences on children's event reports, Developmental Psychology 30, 515–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B., Tromovitch, A. and Bauserman, R. (1998). Meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of child sexual abuse using college samples, Psychological Bulletin 124 (1), 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rind, B., Tromovitch, A. and Bauserman, R. (2001). The validity and appropriateness of methods, analyses, and conclusions in Rind et al. (1998): A rebuttal of victimological critique from Ondersma et al. (2001) and Dallam et al. (2001), Psychological Bulletin 127 (6), 734–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Convention (1989). United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on November 20, 1989. See the following website for detailed information on the Convention and its optional protocols as well as the text of the convention itself: http://www.unicef.org/crc/crc.htm.

  • Wilson, J.C. and Pipe, M.E. (1989). The effects of cues on young children's recall of real events, New Zealand Journal of Psychology 18, 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grover, S. Social Research in the Advancement of Children's Rights. Journal of Academic Ethics 1, 119–130 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025419317512

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025419317512

Navigation