Skip to main content
Log in

Differences Between Synchronic and Idealized Diachronic Theory-Elements: A Reply to Martti Kuokkanen and Timo Tuomivaara

  • Published:
Journal for General Philosophy of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the connection between the Boyle-Mariotte-law and the Van der Waals-law from the perspective of the Structuralist Theory Conception as well as the Pragmatic Idealization Concept (PIC). It was inspired by an interesting paper by Martti Kuokkanen and Timo Tuomivaara, recently published in this journal.1 One result of the Kuokkanen-Tuomivaara-paper is that the Boyle-Mariotte-law is not an idealized law and therefore not an idealized special case of the Van der Waals-law, but that its models can be expanded to the models of an idealized special case of the Van der Waals-law. From the perspective of idealized diachronic theory-elements and -nets the second part of this result shall be questioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Balzer, W., Moulines, C. U., and Sneed, J. D.: 1987, An Architectonic for Science–the Structuralist Program, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase, M.: 1996, ‘Pragmatic Idealization and Structuralist Reconstructions of Theories’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 27, 215–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuokkanen, M. and Tuomivaara, T.: 1994, ‘The Treshold Model of Scientific Change and the Continuity of Scientific Knowledge’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 25, 327–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1961, The Structure of Science, Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., New York et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L.: 1989, ‘On the (Idealizational) Structure of Economic Theories’, Erkenntnis 30, 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L.: 1990, ‘Abstracts are not our Constructs. The Mental Constructs are Abstracts’, in: Brzezinski, J., Coniglione, F., Kuipers, T. A. F. and Nowak, L. (eds.): Idealization I. General Problems, Editions Rodopi B. V., Amsterdam et al., 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haasse, M. Differences Between Synchronic and Idealized Diachronic Theory-Elements: A Reply to Martti Kuokkanen and Timo Tuomivaara. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 28, 359–366 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008271729880

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008271729880

Navigation