Abstract
Agriculture should be viewed not as an industry but rather as a set of sectors organized around region, commodity, and institution. As such, agriculture adjusts well to a situation of “abundance” (excess supplies of major commodities).
Although these sector interests are often referred to as “special interests,” they have effectively used public policy to generate agricultural development, and will continue to have a developmental impulse. Sector interests will, therefore, resist most proposals based on macrosystem perspectives which would reduce government support for agricultural development. These sectors will continue to be quite influential in deciding agricultural policy, though they will find it possible to adjust not only to “abundance” in the market place, but also to such political constraints as may be imposed in pursuit of such goals as consumer health, soil conservation, and environmental preservation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cater, Douglass and Philip R. Lee, editors. 1972.Politics of Health (Huntington, New York: Robert E. Krieger).
Cochrane, Willard. 1985. “The Need to Rethink Agricultural Policy in General and to Perform Some Radical Surgery on Commodity Programs in Particular,”American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(December): 1002–1009.
Cook, Kenneth A. and Susan E. Sechler, “Agricultural Policy: Paying for Our Past Mistakes,”Issues in Science and Technology, (Fall): 97–110.
Curry Foundation. 1984.Agriculture, Stability, and Growth: Toward a Cooperative Approach. (Port Washington, N.Y.: Associated Faculty Press).
Dahl, Robert A. 1956.A Preface to Democratic Theory. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
Doyle, Jack. 1985. “Biotechnology Research and Agricultural Stability,”Issues in Science and Technology. (Fall): 111–124.
Farrell, Kenneth. 1985. Review of D. Gale Johnson and G. Edward Schuh, editors,The Role of Markets in the World Food Economy. (Boulder, Colorado: Western Press, 1983), inAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(February): 170.
Josling, Tim. 1985. Review of Simeon Harris et al., and Brian E. Hill, books on the Common Agricultural Program of EEC inThe American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(November): 886–887.
Kash, Don E., and Robert W. Rycroft. 1984.U.S. Energy Policy: Crisis and Complacency. (Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.)
Lowi, Theodore J. 1969.The End of Liberalism. (New York: W. W. Norton).
Marcus, Alan. 1987 (forthcoming). “The History of Agricultural Research,” Don F. Hadwiger and William P. Browne, editors,Public Policy and Agricultural Technology. (Macmillan).
Schmid, A. Allan. 1985. Review of Mancur Olson,The Rise and Decline of Nations. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982), in theAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67 (November): 894.
Additional information
Don F. Hadwiger is Professor of Political Science at Iowa State University. His numerous publications on agriculture and food policy includeThe Politics of Agricultural Research andThe New Politics of Food. His most recent publicationWorld Food Policies: Toward Agricultural Interdependence is co-edited with William P. Brown.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hadwiger, D.F. The politics of agricultural abundance. Agric Hum Values 3, 99–107 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01535490
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01535490