Abstract
Xunzi is often interpreted as offering a method for transforming our desires. This essay argues that, strictly speaking, he does not. Rather, Xunzi offers a method of developing an auxiliary motivational structure capable of overpowering our original desires, when there is a conflict. When one succeeds in transforming one’s overall character, original desires nevertheless remain and are largely satisfied. This explains why one may be motivated to follow the way even before one has developed noble intentions. On Xunzi’s view, following dao provides the best chance of satisfying one’s original desires, as well as fulfilling the more noble aspirations that arise from the process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chong, Kim-Ching. 2007. Early Confucian Ethics. La Salle, IL: Open Court Press.
ICS (Institute of Chinese Studies). 1996. A Concordance to the Xunzi (cited as chapter/page/line number, and “K:” refers to section numbers in John Knoblock’s translation of the Xunzi).
Ivanhoe, Philip J. 1991. “A Happy Symmetry: Xunzi’s Ethical Thought.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 59.2: 309–22.
Kline III, T.C. 2000. “Moral Agency and Motivation in the Xunzi.” In Kline III, T. C., and P. J. Ivanhoe, eds., Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, 155–175. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
———. 2006. “The Therapy of Desire in Early Confucianism: Xunzi.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5.2: 235–246.
Knoblock, John. 1988–1994. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. 3 vols. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lau, D. C. 1970. Mencius. New York: Penguin Books.
Lau, D. C., and F. C. Chen, eds. 1996. A Concordance to the Xunzi. Institute of Chinese Studies (ICS) Ancient Chinese Texts Concordance Series. Hong Kong: The Commercial Press.
Nivison, David S. 1996. “Critique of David B. Wong’s ‘Xunzi on Moral Motivation’.” In Chinese Language, Thought, and Culture: Nivison and His Critics. Ed. by Philip J. Ivanhoe. Chicago: Open Court.
———. 1996b. The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy. Edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Chicago: Open Court.
Perrett, Roy W. 2002. “Evil and Human Nature.” The Monist 85.2: 304–319.
Stalnaker, Aaron. 2006. Overcoming Our Evil: Human Nature and Spiritual Exercises in Xunzi and Augustine. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Van Norden, Bryan. 2000. “Mengzi and Xunzi: Two Views of Human Agency.” In Kline III, T. C., and P. J. Ivanhoe, eds., Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, 103–134. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Watson, Burton. 1963. Hsün Tzu: Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wong, David, B. 2000. “Xunzi on Moral Motivation.” In Kline III, T. C., and P. J. Ivanhoe, eds., Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, 135–154. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Yang, Liang 楊倞. 1996. Xunzi 荀子. Shanghai 上海: Shanghai Guji Chubanshe 上海古籍出版社.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagen, K. Xunzi and the Prudence of Dao: Desire as the Motive to Become Good. Dao 10, 53–70 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-010-9202-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-010-9202-1