Abstract
This study examines the processes ofdecision-making used by intensive care(critical care) specialists. Ninety-ninespecialists completed a questionnaire involvingthree clinical cases, using a novel methodologyinvestigating the role of uncertainty andtemporal-related factors, and exploring a rangeof ethical issues. Validation and triangulationof the results was done via a comparison studywith a medically lay, but highly informed groupof 37 law students. For both study groups,constructing reasons for a decision was largelyan interpretative and imaginative exercise thatwent beyond the data (as presented), commonlyresulting in different reasons supporting thesame conclusions and similar reasons supportingopposite conclusions. The skills of ethicalimagination and interpretation were related toan individual's prior lived experience,construed in the broadest sense. Application ofthese skills of ethical imagination andinterpretation always occurred, to some degree,in a state of uncertainty and almost alwaysinvolved temporal relationships.Using these results, a theory of ethicaldecision-making is proffered. Three levels ortypes of reasoning processes may be present.Type I decision-making involves the applicationof rules, usually in a deductive fashion. TypeII decision-making is characterised by aprocess where a plurality of reasons arebalanced, weighed and sifted with each other.Type III decision-making is intimately linkedwith respondents lived experiences and `crafts'the content of type I and II reasoningprocesses, via the application of ethicalimagination and interpretation. Relationshipsbetween these three types of reasoningprocesses, and with narrative ethics, are alsodiscussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ten Have H. The hyperreality of clinical ethics: a unitary theory and hermeneutics. Theoretical Medicine 1994; 15: 113–131.
Callahan D. Bioethics as a discipline. Hastings Center Studies 1973; 1: 66–73.
Vincent J. European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: results of an ethical questionnaire. Intensive Care Medicine 1990; 16: 256–264.
Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee. Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning forgoing life-sustaining treatments. Critical Care Medicine 1992; 20(3): 320–326.
Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R et al. Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. JAMA 1995; 273(9): 703–708.
Miller WL and Crabtree BF. Primary care research: a multimethod typology and qualitative road map. In: Crabtree BF and Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Research Methods for Primary Care, Vol. 3. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1992, p. 17.
Hunter KM. Doctors’ Stories: Tthe Narrative Structure of Medical Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.
Gillett G. Reasonable Care. Bristol: Bristol Press, 1989, p. 19. (Hughes J, series editor. Mind matters.)
Johnson M. Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1993.
Waymack MH. Narrative ethics in the clinical setting. Making the Rounds in Health, Faith and Ethics 1996; 1(15): 1–4.
Frank AW. The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness and Ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
May WF. The Physician's Covenant: Images of the Healer in Medical Ethics. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, K. Medical Decision-Making: An Argument for Narrative and Metaphor. Theor Med Bioeth 23, 55–73 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019595804858
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019595804858