Skip to main content
Log in

Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules

Springer, Dordrecht, 2009, Volume 16 of the Springer Argumentation Library. ISBN: 978-90-481-2613-2. DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2614-9. HB: $139.00

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • van Eemeren, F.H. 1987. Argument studies’ five estates. In Argument and critical practices, ed. J.W. Wenzel, 9–24. Alta, UT: Speech Communication Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 2004. A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H., R. Grootendorst, S. Jackson, and S. Jacobs. 1993. Reconstructing argumentative discourse. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eemeren, F.H., and P. Houtlosser. 1999. Strategic manoeuvering in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies 4: 479–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dale Hample.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hample, D. Frans van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, & Bert Meuffels: Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules. Argumentation 24, 375–381 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9183-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-010-9183-6

Navigation