Skip to main content
Log in

Coherence in Epistemology and Belief Revision*

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general theory of coherence is proposed, in which systemic and relational coherence are shown to be interdefinable. When this theory is applied to sets of sentences, it turns out that logical closure obscures the distinctions that are needed for a meaningful analysis of coherence. It is concluded that references to “all beliefs” in coherentist phrases such as “all beliefs support each other” have to be modified so that merely derived beliefs are excluded. Therefore, in order to avoid absurd conclusions, coherentists have to accept a weak version of epistemic priority, that sorts out merely derived beliefs. Furthermore, it is shown that in belief revision theory, coherence cannot be adequately represented by logical closure, but has to be represented separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • C. Alchourrón P. Gärdenfors D. Makinson (1985) ArticleTitle‘On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions’ Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 510–530 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2274239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Bender (1989) ‘Coherence, Justification, and Knowledge: The Current Debate’ J.W. Bender (Eds) The Current State of the Coherence Theory Kluwer Dordrecht 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Brendel (1999) ArticleTitle‘Coherence Theory of Knowledge: A Gradational Account’ Erkenntnis 50 293–307 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005538324684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Daya (1960) ArticleTitle‘Types of Coherence’ Philosophical Quarterly 10 193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Gärdenfors (1990) ArticleTitle‘The Dynamics of Belief Systems: Foundations vs. Coherence Theories’ Revue Internationale de Philosophie 44 24–46

    Google Scholar 

  • S.O. Hansson (2000a) ArticleTitle‘Coherentist Contraction’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 315–330 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004743819412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.O. Hansson (2000b) ArticleTitle‘Formalization in Philosophy’ Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 162–175 Occurrence Handle10.2307/421204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.O. Hansson (2003) ArticleTitle‘Ten Philosophical Problems in Belief Revision’ Journal of Logic and Computation 13 37–49 Occurrence Handle10.1093/logcom/13.1.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S.O. Hansson E.J. Olsson (1999) ArticleTitle‘Providing Foundations for Coherentism’ Erkenntnis 51 243–265 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005510414170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.I. Lewis (1946) An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation Open Court Publishing Co La Salle, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Millgram (2000) ArticleTitle‘Coherence: The Price of the Ticket’ Journal of Philosophy 97 IssueID2 82–93 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2678447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Olsson (1997) ArticleTitle‘A Coherence Interpretation of Semi-Revision’ Theoria 63 IssueID1–2 105–134

    Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Olsson (1998) ArticleTitle‘Making Beliefs Coherent’ Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 IssueID2 143–163 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008274704871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E.J. Olsson (1999) ArticleTitle‘Cohering With’ Erkenntnis 50 273–291 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005530006938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Rescher (1973) The Coherence Theory of Truth Clarendon Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Spohn (1999) ArticleTitle‘Two Coherence Principles’ Erkenntnis 50 155–175 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005561502394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Thagard (1991) ‘The Dinosaur Debate: Explanatory Coherence and the Problem of Competing Hypotheses ’ R. Cummins (Eds) Philosophy and AI MIT Press Cambridge MA 279–300

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Ove Hansson.

Additional information

*Contribution to “Seven Bridges”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansson, S.O. Coherence in Epistemology and Belief Revision*. Philos Stud 128, 93–108 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-4058-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-4058-7

Keywords

Navigation