Abstract
A general theory of coherence is proposed, in which systemic and relational coherence are shown to be interdefinable. When this theory is applied to sets of sentences, it turns out that logical closure obscures the distinctions that are needed for a meaningful analysis of coherence. It is concluded that references to “all beliefs” in coherentist phrases such as “all beliefs support each other” have to be modified so that merely derived beliefs are excluded. Therefore, in order to avoid absurd conclusions, coherentists have to accept a weak version of epistemic priority, that sorts out merely derived beliefs. Furthermore, it is shown that in belief revision theory, coherence cannot be adequately represented by logical closure, but has to be represented separately.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. Alchourrón P. Gärdenfors D. Makinson (1985) ArticleTitle‘On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions’ Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 510–530 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2274239
J.W. Bender (1989) ‘Coherence, Justification, and Knowledge: The Current Debate’ J.W. Bender (Eds) The Current State of the Coherence Theory Kluwer Dordrecht 1–14
E. Brendel (1999) ArticleTitle‘Coherence Theory of Knowledge: A Gradational Account’ Erkenntnis 50 293–307 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005538324684
K. Daya (1960) ArticleTitle‘Types of Coherence’ Philosophical Quarterly 10 193–204
P. Gärdenfors (1990) ArticleTitle‘The Dynamics of Belief Systems: Foundations vs. Coherence Theories’ Revue Internationale de Philosophie 44 24–46
S.O. Hansson (2000a) ArticleTitle‘Coherentist Contraction’ Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 315–330 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1004743819412
S.O. Hansson (2000b) ArticleTitle‘Formalization in Philosophy’ Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 162–175 Occurrence Handle10.2307/421204
S.O. Hansson (2003) ArticleTitle‘Ten Philosophical Problems in Belief Revision’ Journal of Logic and Computation 13 37–49 Occurrence Handle10.1093/logcom/13.1.37
S.O. Hansson E.J. Olsson (1999) ArticleTitle‘Providing Foundations for Coherentism’ Erkenntnis 51 243–265 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005510414170
C.I. Lewis (1946) An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation Open Court Publishing Co La Salle, Ill.
E. Millgram (2000) ArticleTitle‘Coherence: The Price of the Ticket’ Journal of Philosophy 97 IssueID2 82–93 Occurrence Handle10.2307/2678447
E.J. Olsson (1997) ArticleTitle‘A Coherence Interpretation of Semi-Revision’ Theoria 63 IssueID1–2 105–134
E.J. Olsson (1998) ArticleTitle‘Making Beliefs Coherent’ Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 IssueID2 143–163 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008274704871
E.J. Olsson (1999) ArticleTitle‘Cohering With’ Erkenntnis 50 273–291 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005530006938
N. Rescher (1973) The Coherence Theory of Truth Clarendon Oxford
W. Spohn (1999) ArticleTitle‘Two Coherence Principles’ Erkenntnis 50 155–175 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005561502394
P. Thagard (1991) ‘The Dinosaur Debate: Explanatory Coherence and the Problem of Competing Hypotheses ’ R. Cummins (Eds) Philosophy and AI MIT Press Cambridge MA 279–300
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
*Contribution to “Seven Bridges”
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hansson, S.O. Coherence in Epistemology and Belief Revision*. Philos Stud 128, 93–108 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-4058-7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-4058-7