Skip to main content
Log in

Ideal Worlds — Wishful Thinking in Deontic Logic

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ideal world semantics of standard deontic logic identifies our obligations with how we would act in an ideal world. However, to act as if one lived in an ideal world is bad moral advice, associated with wishful thinking rather than well-considered moral deliberation. Ideal world semantics gives rise to implausible logical principles, and the metaphysical arguments that have been put forward in its favour turn out to be based on a too limited view of truth-functional representation. It is argued that ideal world semantics should be given up in favour of other, more plausible uses of possible worlds for modelling normative subject-matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aqvist, Lennart ‘Good Samaritans, Contrary-to-Duty Imperatives, and Epistemic Obligations’, Noûs 1:361–379, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baier, Kurt, ‘Defining morality without prejudice’, Monist 64:325–341, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edvardsson, Karin, and Sven Ove Hansson ‘When is a goal rational?’, Social Choice and Welfare 24:343–361, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Føllesdal, Dagfinn, and Risto Hilpinen, ‘Deontic Logic: An Introduction’, in Risto Hilpinen, (ed.), Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1970, pp. 1–35.

  5. Frankena, William K., Thinking about Morality, University of Michigan Press, 1980.

  6. Hansson, Bengt, ‘An Analysis of Some Deontic Logics’, Noûs 3:373–398, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hansson, Sven Ove, ‘Formalization in philosophy’, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6:162–175, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansson, Sven Ove, The Structure of Values and Norms, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

  9. Hansson, Sven Ove, ‘A new representation theorem for contranegative deontic logic’, Studia Logica 77:1–7, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Prior, AN, ‘The Paradoxes of Derived Obligation’, Mind 63:64–65, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prior, AN, ‘Escapism’, in AI Melden, (ed.), Essays in Moral Philosophy. University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1958, pp. 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Purtill, Richard, ‘Deontically Perfect Worlds’, Philosophia 3:429–438, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reichenbach, Bruce, ‘Basinger on Reichenbach and the Best Possible World’, International Philosophical Quarterly 20:343–346, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ross, Alf, ‘Imperatives and Logic’, Theoria 7:53–71, 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson, Catherine, ‘Prospects for Non-cognitivism’, Inquiry 44:291–314, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘Deontic Logic’, Mind 60:1–15, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  17. von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘Is and Ought’, in MC Doeser and JN Kraay, (eds.), Facts and Values, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 1986, pp. 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  18. von Wright, Georg Henrik, ‘Deontic Logic — as Iseeit’, paper presented at the Fourth I nternational Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science (DEON’98), Bologna, 1998.

  19. Zynda, Lyle, ‘Coherence as an ideal of rationality’, Synthese 109:175–216, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sven Ove Hansson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansson, S.O. Ideal Worlds — Wishful Thinking in Deontic Logic. Stud Logica 82, 329–336 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-006-8100-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-006-8100-3

Keywords

Navigation