Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-18T09:37:37.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEMS IN COST–BENEFIT ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2007

SVEN OVE HANSSON
Affiliation:
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

Abstract

Cost–benefit analysis (CBA) is much more philosophically interesting than has in general been recognized. Since it is the only well-developed form of applied consequentialism, it is a testing-ground for consequentialism and for the counterfactual analysis that it requires. Ten classes of philosophical problems that affect the practical performance of cost–benefit analysis are investigated: topic selection, dependence on the decision perspective, dangers of super synopticism and undue centralization, prediction problems, the indeterminateness of our control over future decisions, the need to exclude certain consequences for moral reasons, bias in the delimitation of consequences, incommensurability of consequences, difficulties in defending the essential requirement of transferability across contexts, and the normatively questionable but equally essential assumption of interpersonal compensability.

Type
Essay
Copyright
2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)