Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From observability to manipulability: Extending the inductive arguments for realism

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years there have been several attempts to construct inductive arguments for some version of scientific realism. Neither the characteristics of what would count as inductive evidence nor the conclusion to be inferred have been specified in ways that escape sceptical criticism. By introducing the pragmatic criterion of manipulative efficacy for a good theory and by sharpening the specification of the necessary inductive principle, the viability of a mutually supporting pair of argument forms are defended. It is shown that by the use of these forms, taken together, a sequence of inductive arguments could be constructed, given suitable cases histories to serve as evidence. It also shown that the best inductive argument for the most daring realist claim is the weakest when compared with similarly structured arguments for less daring claims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronson, J. L.: 1988, ‘Testing for Convergent Realism’, Proceedings of the 1988 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

  • Aronson, J. L.: 1991, ‘Verisimilitude and Type-Hierarchies’, Philosophical Topics 18, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J. L., Harré, R., and Way, E. C.: 1994, Realism Rescued, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Hon. R.: 1666, The Origins of Forms and Qualities According to the Corpuscular Philosophy Davis, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavius, C.: 1602, In Sphaeram de Ionnanis de Sacrobosco, Lyons.

  • Giere, R. L.: 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1983, Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R.: 1961, Theories and Things, Sheed and Ward, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R.: 1986, Varieties of Realism, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L.: 1984, ‘A Confutation of Convergent Realism’, in J. Leplin (ed.), Scientific Realism, University of California Press, Berkley, pp. 218–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, P.: 1991, Inference to the Best Explanation, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton-Smith, W.: 1981, The Rationality of Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1980, The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Linacre College, Oxford, United Kingdom

    Rom Harré

Authors
  1. Rom Harré
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

A popular version of this argument appeared in Perspectives on Science, 1994.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harré, R. From observability to manipulability: Extending the inductive arguments for realism. Synthese 108, 137–155 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413494

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413494

Keywords

Search

Navigation