Skip to main content
Log in

Introduction to Natural Language Semantics, Henriëtte de Swart

  • Published:
Journal of Logic, Language and Information Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bach, E., 1989, Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics, New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäuerle, R. and Egli, U., 1985, “Anapher, Nominalphrasen und Eselssätze,” Technical Report, Papier Nr. 105, Sonderforschungsbereich 99, Universität Konstanz.

  • Cann, R., 1993, Formal Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G. and McConell-Ginet, S., 1990, Meaning and Grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N., 1970, “Remarks on nominalization,” pp. 184-221 in Readings in Transformational Grammar, A. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum, eds., Waltham, MA: Ginn and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., 1983, Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruse, D., 1986, Lexical Semantics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P., 1993, “Transsentential meditations,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

  • Evans, G., 1977, “Pronouns, quantifiers, and relative clauses I,” The Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, 467-536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, T., 1993, “The donkey strikes back,” pp. 130-138 in Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Utrecht.

  • Gamut, L.T.F., 1991, Logic, Language and Meaning, 2 Vols., Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J. and Stokhof, M., n.d., “Dynamic Montague Grammar,” 1987.

  • Heim, I., 1982, “The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Heim, I., 1990, “E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora,” Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, H., 1993, “Studied flexibility,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Amsterdam.

  • Kamp, H., 1971, “Formal properties of 'now',” Theoria 37, 227-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H., 1979, “Events, instants and temporal reference,” pp. 367-417 in Semantics from Different Points of View, R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow, eds., Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H., 1981, “A theory of truth and semantic representation,” pp. 277-322 in Formal Methods in the Study of Language, J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof, eds., Mathematical Centre Tracts 135, Amsterdam.

  • Kamp, H. and Reyle, U., 1993, From Discourse to Logic, Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, E., 1987, “Unreducible n-ary quantifiers in natural language,” pp. 286-317 in Generalized Quantifiers, P. Gärdenfors, ed., Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: 1981, “The notional category of modality,” pp. 38-74 in Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics, H. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser, eds., Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S., 1989, “Tense and time,” pp. 513-552 in Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. IV, D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner, eds., Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. and Segal, G., 1995, Knowledge of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1973, Counterfactuals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1975, “Adverbs of quantification,” pp. 3-15 in Formal Semantics of Natural Language, E. Keenan, ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R., 1985, Logical Form as a Level of Linguistic Representation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, J., 1993, Everything that Linguists Always Wanted to Know about Logic But Were Afraid to Ask, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R., 1974a, “English as a formal language,” pp. 189-223 in Formal Philosophy, R. Thomason, ed., Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R., 1974b, “The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English,” pp. 221-242 in Formal Philosophy, R. Thomason, ed., Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B., 1987, “Noun phrase interpretation and type shifting principles,” pp. 115-143 in Studies in Discourse representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, and M. Stokhof, eds., Dordrecht: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B., ter Meulen, A., and Wall, R., 1990, Mathematical Methods in Linguistics, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A., 1967, Past, Present, and Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C., 1989, “Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse,” Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 689-721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooy, R., 1997, “Attitudes in changing contexts,” Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Stuttgart.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hartmann, K., Zimmermann, T.E. Introduction to Natural Language Semantics, Henriëtte de Swart. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10, 511–518 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017594806155

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017594806155

Navigation