Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Martha Albertson Fineman, Jack E. Jackson and Adam P. Romero (eds): Feminist and Queer Legal Theory: Intimate Encounters, Uncomfortable Conversations

Ashgate, Farnham, 2009, 490 pp, Price £35.00 (PB), ISBN: 978-0-7546-7552-5

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 539 U.S. 558 (2003).

References

  • Carbado, Devon. 2000. Black rights, gay rights, civil rights. UCLA Law Review 47: 1467–1519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Case, Mary.Ann. 2001. How high the apple pie? A few troubling questions about where, why, and how the burden of care for children should be shifted. Chicago-Kent Law Review 76: 1753–1788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currah, Paisley. 2003. The transgender rights imaginary. Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law 4: 705–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emens, Elizabeth. 2004. Monogamy’s law: Compulsory monogamy and polyamorous existence. NYU Review of Law and Social Change 29: 277–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineman, Martha. 1995. The neutered mother, the sexual family and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halley, Janet. 2006. Split decisions: How and why to take a break from feminism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Duncan. 1993. Sexy dressing etc.: Essays on the power and politics of culture identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, Adrienne. 1980. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs 5: 631–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, Robin. 1986. Deconstructing the CLS-Fem split. Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal 2: 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino, Kenji. 2000. The epistemic contract of bisexual erasure. Stanford Law Review 52: 353–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Rosie Harding

Authors
  1. Rosie Harding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rosie Harding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harding, R. Martha Albertson Fineman, Jack E. Jackson and Adam P. Romero (eds): Feminist and Queer Legal Theory: Intimate Encounters, Uncomfortable Conversations. Fem Leg Stud 21, 311–314 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9220-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9220-y

Search

Navigation