Abstract
In this paper we report a study of the approach of six U.K. water and electricity companies towards managing the relationship with their 'green' stakeholders. Stakeholders are accorded increasing importance in political discourse and stakeholder theory is emerging as a promising framework for the analysis of corporate social performance.
We studied the companies' general approach towards green stakeholders, their dealings with specific stakeholder groups and whether they emphasised the consultation or the information aspect of stakeholder management. We found that none of the six companies had a systematic stakeholder approach that extended to all potential green stakeholders. Rather, the importance of specific stakeholder groups seemed to be determined by managers' intuition and by the stance that the stakeholders themselves displayed towards the company.
Green stakeholders with an institutional power base – government via legislation, environmental and industry regulators – emerged as the most immediately influential stakeholders. The Environment Agency, the environmental regulator, played an especially important role in the companies' environmental management. Customers and the general public – the source of corporate social legitimacy – were also considered to be important, but their influence was more long term and based on voice, rather than the potential for direct retaliation. Economic stakeholders were generally considered to be not very interested in the companies' environmental performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, J. A. and E. Petkus, Jr.: 1994, 'Toward a Stakeholder-Based Policy Process: An Application of the Social Marketing Perspective to Environmental Policy Development', Policy Sciences 27, 37–51.
Argandoña, A.: 1998, 'The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good', Journal of Business Ethics 17(9–10), 1093–1102.
Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1995, 'A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance', Academy of Management Review 20(1), 92–117.
Donaldson, T.: 1982, Corporate Morality (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs).
Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, 'The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications', Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91.
Dooley, R. S. and L. D. Lerner: 1994, 'Pollution, Profits, and Stakeholders: The Constraining Effect of Economic Performance on CEO Concern with Stakeholder Expectations', Journal of Business Ethics 13(9), 701–711.
Eisenhardt, K. M.: 1989, 'Building Theories from Case Study Research', Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532–550.
Fineman, S. and K. Clarke: 1996, 'Green Stakeholders: Industry Interpretations and Response', Journal of Management Studies 33(6), 715–730.
Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pitman, Marshfield, MA).
Frost, F. A.: 1995, 'The Use of Stakeholder Analysis to Understand Ethical and Moral Issues in the Primary Resource Sector', Journal of Business Ethics 14(8), 653–661.
Greenley, G. E. and G. R. Foxall: 1997, 'Multiple Stakeholder Orientation in U.K. Companies and the Implications for Company Performance', Journal of Management Studies 34(2), 259–284.
Holsti, O. R.: 1969, Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities (Addison Wesley, Reading, MA).
Hill, C. W. and T. M. Jones: 1992, 'Stakeholder-Agency Theory', Journal of Management Studies 29(2), 127–154.
Hosmer, L. T.: 1994, 'Strategic Planning as if Ethics Mattered', Strategic Management Journal 15 (Special Issue, Summer), 17–34.
Husted, B. W.: 1998, 'Organizational Justice and the Management of Stakeholder Relations', Journal of Business Ethics 17(6), 643–651.
Hummels, H.: 1998, 'Organizing Ethics: A Stakeholder Debate?', Journal of Business Ethics 17(13), 1403–1419.
Huse, M. and D. Eide: 1996, 'Stakeholder Management and the Avoidance of Corporate Control', Business & Society 35(2), 211–243.
Jones, T. M.: 1995, 'Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics', Academy of Management Review 20(2), 404–437.
Krippendorff, K.: 1980, Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA).
Litz, R.: 1996, 'A Resource-Based-View of the Socially Responsible Firm: Stakeholder Interdependence, Ethical Awareness, and Issue Responsiveness as Strategic Assets', Journal of Business Ethics 15, 1355–1363.
Lerner, L. D. and G. E. Fryxell: 1994, 'CEO Stakeholder Attitudes and Corporate Social Activity in the Fortune 50 0', Business & Society 33(1), 58–81.
Logsdon, J. M. and K. Yuthas: 1997, 'Corporate Social Performance, Stakeholder Orientation, and Organizational Moral Development', Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1213–1226.
Miles, M. B. and A. M. Huberman: 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1997, 'Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts', Academy of Management Review 22(4), pp. 853–886.
Mitroff, I.: 1983, Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).
Polonsky, M. J.: 1995, 'A Stakeholder Theory Approach to Designing Environmental Marketing Strategy', Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 10(3), 29–46.
Post, J. E.: 1991, 'Managing as if the Earth Mattered', Business Horizons (July-August), 32–38.
Roberts, R. W.: 1992, 'Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Theory', Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(6), 595–612.
Roome, N.: 1992, 'Developing Environmental Management Strategies', Business Strategy and the Environment 3(4), 9–16.
Rowley, T. J.: 1997, 'Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences', Academy of Management Review 22(4), 887–910.
Schmidheiny, S.: 1992, Changing Course: A Global Business Perspective on Development and the Environment (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).
Shrivastava, P.: 1994, 'CASTRATED Environment: GREENING Organizational Studies', Organization Studies 15(5), 705–726.
Sillanpää, M.: 1998, 'The Body Shop Values Report-Towards Integrated Stakeholder Auditing', Journal of Business Ethics 17(13), 1443–1456.
Starik, M.: 1995, 'Should Trees Have Managerial Standing? Toward Stakeholder Status for Non-Human Nature', Journal of Business Ethics 14, 207–217.
Stead, W. E. and J. G. Stead: 1996, Management for a Small Planet, 2nd. edn. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA).
Ullmann, A. A.: 1985, 'Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationship among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms', Academy of Management Review 10(3), 540–557.
Wheeler, D. and M. Sillanpää: 1997, The Stakeholder Corporation: A Blueprint for Maximising Stakeholder Value (Pitman, London).
Wood, D. J.: 1991, 'Corporate Social Performance Revisited', Academy of Management Review 16, 691–718.
Woodward, D. G., P. Edwards and F. Birkin: 1996, 'Organizational Legitimacy and Stakeholder Information Provision', British Journal of Management 7, 329–347.
Zadek, S.: 1998, 'Balancing Performance, Ethics and Accountability', Journal of Business Ethics 13 (October), 1421–1441.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harvey, B., Schaefer, A. Managing Relationships with Environmental Stakeholders: A Study of U.K. Water and Electricity Utilities. Journal of Business Ethics 30, 243–260 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006356928957
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006356928957