Abstract
Until recently philosophy of religion has been almost exclusively focused upon the analysis of western religious ideas. The central concern of the discipline has been the concept “God”, as that concept has been understood within Judaeo-Christianity. However, this narrow remit threatens to render philosophy of religion irrelevant today. To avoid this philosophy of religion should become a genuinely multicultural discipline. But how, if at all, can philosophy of religion rise to this challenge? The paper considers fictionalism about religious discourse as a possible methodological standpoint from which to practice a tradition-neutral form of philosophy of religion. However, after examining some of the problems incurred by fictionalism, the paper concludes that fictionalism and religious diversity are uneasy bedfellows; which implies that fictionalism is unlikely to be the best theory to shape the practice of philosophy of religion in a multicultural context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akhtar S. (2008) The revival of philosophy among Muslims. In: Cheetham D., King R. (eds) Contemporary practice and method in the philosophy of religion: New essays. Continuum, London & New York, pp 59–73
Cheetham D. (2008) Comparative philosophy of religion. In: Cheetham D., King R. (eds) Contemporary practice and method in the philosophy of religion: New essays. Continuum, London & New York, pp 101–116
Cheetham, D., King, R. (eds) (2008) Contemporary practice and method in the philosophy of religion: New essays. Continuum, London & New York
Cordry B.S. (2010) A critique of religious fictionalism. Religious Studies 46: 77–89
Eklund M. (2005) Fiction, indifference, and ontology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71: 557–579
Eshleman A. (2005) Can an atheist believe in God?. Religious Studies 41: 183–199
Eshleman A. (2010) Religious fictionalism defended: Reply to Cordry. Religious Studies 46: 91–96
Field H. (1980) Science without numbers. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Griffith-Dickson G. (2000) Human and divine: An introduction to the philosophy of religious experience. Duckworth, London
Griffith-Dickson G. (2005) The philosophy of religion. SCM Press, London
Harrison V.S. (2006a) The pragmatics of defining religion in a multi-cultural world. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59: 133–152
Harrison V.S. (2006b) Internal realism and the problem of religious diversity. Philosophia 34: 287–301
Joyce R. (2002) The myth of morality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kalderon, M.E. (eds) (2005) Fictionalism in metaphysics. Clarendon, Oxford
Kalderon M.E. (2007) Moral fictionalism. Clarendon, Oxford
Le Poidevin R. (1996) Arguing for atheism: An introduction to the philosophy of religion. Routledge, London
Lipton P. (2007) Science and religion: The immersion solution. In: Moore A., Scott M. (eds) Realism and religion: Philosophical and theological perspectives. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 31–46
MacIntyre I. (1988) Whose justice? Which rationality?. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame
Murphy N. (2008) MacIntyre, tradition-dependent rationality and the end of philosophy of religion. In: Cheetham D., King R. (eds) Contemporary practice and method in the philosophy of religion: New essays. Continuum, London & New York, pp 32–44
Phillips D.Z. (1986) Belief, change and forms of life. Macmillan, London
Sainsbury R.M. (2010) Fiction and fictionalism. Routledge, Oxford & New York
Schellenberg J.L. (2005) Prolegomena to a philosophy of religion. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
Schellenberg J.L. (2008) Imagining the future: How scepticism can renew philosophy of religion. In: Cheetham D., King R. (eds) Contemporary practice and method in the philosophy of religion: New essays. Continuum, London, pp 15–31
Stanley J. (2001) Hermeneutic fictionalism. Midwest Studies in Philosophy XXV: 36–71
Taliaferro C. (1998) Contemporary philosophy of religion. Blackwell, Oxford
Taliaferro C. (2009) Philosophy of religion: A beginner’s guide. Oneworld, Oxford
Trakakis N. (2008) The end of philosophy of religion. Continuum, London & New York
van Fraassen B. (1980) The scientific image. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Walton K. (1978a) Fearing fictions. Journal of Philosophy 65: 5–27
Walton K. (1978b) How close are fictional worlds to the real world?. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 37: 11–23
Webster D. (2008) Buddhist approaches—not “what?” but “how?”. In: Cheetham D., King R. (eds) Contemporary practice and method in the philosophy of religion: New essays. Continuum, London & New York, pp 87–100
Yablo S. (2000) Apriority and existence. In: Boghossian P., Peacocke C. (eds) New essays on the a priori. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 197–228
Yandell K. (1999) Philosophy of religion: A contemporary introduction. Routledge, London & New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harrison, V.S. Philosophy of religion, fictionalism, and religious diversity. Int J Philos Relig 68, 43–58 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9251-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-010-9251-8