Abstract
This article proposes "equality" as a topic for interactionist research. By drawing on the perspectives of Herbert Blumer, Alfred Schutz, and Harold Garfinkel, an attempt is made to lay the theoretical groundwork for studying the interpretive and experiential aspects of equality. Blumer's fundamental premises of symbolic interactionism, Schutz's analysis of relevance and typification, and Garfinkel's treatment of reflexivity and indexicality are explicated and applied to the subject of equality. I then draw upon the moral theory of John Dewey to suggest the positive role that interactionist theory and research might play in the resolution of problematic situations that are framed in terms of equality. Collectively, the complementary aspects of Blumer's, Schutz's, Garfinkel's, and Dewey's thought are used to justify and launch a program of research on a neglected yet important topic: the social construction of equality in everyday life.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguilar, J.L. (1980). Egalitarianism as Dramaturgy: Ideology and Social Interaction in Meso-America. Symbolic Interaction 3: 105-121.
Barber, M. (1991). The Ethics Behind the Absence of Ethics in Alfred Schutz's Thought. Human Studies 14: 129-140.
Becker, H. (1963, 1973). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
Berger, P.L. (1963). Invitation to Sociology. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
Berger, P.L. and Kellner, H. (1981). Sociology Reinterpreted: An Essay on Method and Vocation. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Anchor.
Blumer, H. (1937). Social Psychology. In E.P. Schmidt (Ed.), Man and Society, pp. 144-198. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Blumer, H. (1971). Social Problems as Collective Behavior. Social Problems 18: 298-306.
Cancian, F. (1995). Truth and Goodness: Does the Sociology of Inequality Promote Social Betterment? Sociological Perspectives 38: 339-356.
Coulon, A. (1995). Ethnomethodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dewey, J. (1929). Experience and Nature. Peru, IL: Open Court.
Dewey, J. (1922, 1983). Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. In J.A. Boydston (Ed.), The Middle Works, vol. 14. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1929, 1988). The Quest for Certainty. In J.A. Boydston (Ed.), The Later Works, vol. 4. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1932, 1989). Ethics. In J.A. Boydston, (Ed.), The Later Works, vol. 7. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Flaherty, M.G. (1987). The Neglected Dimension of Temporality in Social Psychology. In N.K. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in Symbolic Interaction, vol. 8, pp. 143-155. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H. and Sacks, H. (1970). On Formal Structures of Practical Actions. In J.C. McKinney and E.A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical Sociology, pp. 338-366. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Goode, E. (1994). Deviant Behavior, 4th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Harris, S.R. (1997). Status Inequality and Close Relationships: An Integrative Typology of Bond-Saving Strategies. Symbolic Interaction 20: 1-20.
Harris, S.R. (2000). Meanings and Measurements of Equality in Marriage: A Study of the Social Construction of Equality. Forthcoming in James A. Holstein and Gale Miller (Eds.), Perspectives on Social Problems, vol. 12. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Heap, J.L. (1990). Applied Ethnomethodology: Looking for the Local Rationality of Reading Activities. Human Studies 13: 39-72.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology, vol. 1. New York: Henry Holt.
Liberman, K. (1980). Ambiguity and Gratuitous Concurrence in Inter-Cultural Communication. Human Studies 3: 65-85.
Maynard, D.W. and Clayman, S.E. (1991). The Diversity of Ethnomethodology. Annual Review of Sociology 17: 385-418.
Mead, G.H. (1899). The Working Hypothesis in Social Reform. American Journal of Sociology 5: 369-371.
Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Myrdal, G. (1944). An American Dilemma. New York: Harper.
Psathas, G. (1980). Approaches to the Study of the World of Everyday Life. Human Studies 3: 3-17.
Prus, R. (1996). Symbolic Interaction and Ethnographic Research. New York: State University of New York Press.
Schutz, A. (1957). Equality and the Meaning Structure of the Social World. In L. Bryson, C.H. Faust, L. Finkelstein and R.M. MacIver (Eds.), Aspects of Human Equality, pp. 33-78. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Schutz, A. (1962). Collected Papers, vol. 1. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schutz, A. (1964). Equality and the Meaning Structure of the Social World. In Collected Papers, vol. 2, pp. 226-273. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schneider, J.W. (1985). Social Problems Theory: The Constructionist View. Annual Review of Sociology 11: 209-229.
Spector, M. and Kitsuse, J.I. (1977, 1987). Constructing Social Problems. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
Strauss, A. (1995). Identity, Biography, History, and Symbolic Representations. Social Psychology Quarterly 58: 4-12.
Zimmerman, D.H. and Pollner, M. (1970). The Everyday World as a Phenomenon. In J.D. Douglas (Ed.), Understanding Everyday Life, pp. 80-103. Chicago: Aldine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harris, S.R. The Social Construction of Equality in Everyday Life. Human Studies 23, 371–393 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005684130032
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005684130032