Abstract
Harnad's proposed “robotic upgrade” of Turing's Test (TT), from a test of linguistic capacity alone to a Total Turing Test (TTT) of linguisticand sensorimotor capacity, conflicts with his claim that no behavioral test provides even probable warrant for attributions of thought because there is “no evidence” of consciousness besides “private experience”. Intuitive, scientific, and philosophical considerations Harnad offers in favor of his proposed upgrade are unconvincing. I agree with Harnad that distinguishing real from “as if” thought on the basis of (presence or lack of) consciousness (thus rejecting Turing (behavioral) testing as sufficient warrant for mental attribution)has the skeptical consequence Harnad accepts — “there is in factno evidence for me that anyone else but me has a mind”. I disagree with hisacceptance of it! It would be better to give up the neo-Cartesian “faith” in private conscious experience underlying Harnad's allegiance to Searle's controversial Chinese Room “Experiment” than give up all claim to know others think. It would be better to allow that (passing) Turing's Test evidences — evenstrongly evidences — thought.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcock, J. E. (1987), “Parapsychology: Science of the Anomalous or Search for the Soul?,”Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10, pp. 553–643.
Austin, J. L. (1957), “A Plea for Excuses,” in R. Ammerman, ed.,Classics of Analytic Philosophy, Indianaopolis: Hackett Publishing Co., pp. 379–398.
Boghossian, P. A. (1989), “Rule Following Considerations,”Mind 98, pp. 507–549.
Churchland, Paul (1988),Matter and Consciousness, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford Books.
Cole, David (1984), “Thought and Thought Experiments,”Philosophical Studies 45, pp. 431–444.
Dennett, D. C. (1982), “The Myth of the Computer: An Exchange,”New York Review of Books XXIX (11), p. 56.
Dennett, D. C. (1987), “Fast Thinking’,The International Stance, Cambridge, MA: MIT/Bradford Books, pp. 323–337.
Descartes, R. (1637),Discourse on Method, translated in J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch, eds.,Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. I, New York: Cambridge University Press (1985), pp. 7–78.
Descartes, R. (1642),Objections and Replies, translated in J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch, eds.,Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. II, New York: Cambridge University Press (1984), pp. 63–397.
Dretske, F. (1985), “Machines and the Mental,”Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 59, pp. 23–33.
Fodor, Jerry A. (1968), “Materialism,” in David M. Rosenthal, ed.,Materialism and the Mind-Body Problem, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, pp. 128–149.
Gunderson, K. (1985),Mentality and Machines, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Harnad, S. E. (1989), “Minds, Machines and Searle,”Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1, pp. 5–25.
Harnad, S. E. (1991), “Other Bodies, Other Minds: A Machine Incarnation of an Old Philosophical Problem,”Mind and Machines 1(1), pp. 43–54.
Hauser, L. S. (1991a), “Why Isn't My Pocket Calculator a Thinking Thing?,” in L. Hauser and W. J. Rapaport (1991), “Why Isn't My Pocket Calculator a Thinking Thing? Essay, Comments, and Reply,”Technical Report 91-20, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science; forthcoming inMinds and Machines.
Hauser, L. S. (1991b), “The Sense of ‘Thinking’: Reply to Rapaport,” in L. Hauser and W.J. Rapaport (1991), “Why Isn't My Pocket Calculator a Thinking Thing? Essay, Comments, and Reply,”Technical Report 91-20, Buffalo: SUNY Buffalo Department of Computer Science; forthcoming inMinds and Machines.
Hodges, A. (1983),Alan Turing: The Enigma of Intelligence, New York: Touchstone/Simon & Schuster.
Kripke, S. (1982),Wittgenstein on Rules and Private language, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Leiber, Justin (1991),Invitation to Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
Leiber, Justin (1985),Can Animals and Machines be Persons?: A Dialogue, Inadianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
Millikan, Ruth (1984),Language, Thought and Other Biological Categories, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nagel, T. (1974), “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?,”Philosophical Review 83, pp. 435–451.
Nagel, T. (1986),The View from Nowhere, New York: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1975), “Indirect Speech Acts,”Expression and Meaning, Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–57.
Searle, J. R. (1980a), “Minds, Brains and Programs,”Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 417–424.
Searle, J. R. (1980b), “Intrinsic Intentionality,”Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 450–456.
Searle, J. R. (1982), “The Myth of the Computer: An Exchange,”New York Review of Books XXIX (11), pp. 56–57.
Searle, J. R. (1983),Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sealre, J. R. (1984a),Minds, Brains and Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1984b), “Intentionality and its Place in Nature,”Synthese 61, pp. 3–16.
Searle, J. R. (1987), “Indeterminacy, Empiricism and the First Person,”The Journal of Philosophy LXXXIV(3), pp. 123–146.
Searle, J. R. (1989), “Consciousness, Unconsciousness and Intentionality,”Philosophical Topics XVII(1), pp. 193–209.
Searle, J. R. (1990a), “Consciousness, Explanatory Inversion and Cognitive Science,”Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, pp. 585–596.
Searle, J. R. (1990b), “Who is Computing with the Brain,”Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, pp. 632–640.
Turing, A. M. (1950), “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,”Mind LIX, pp. 433–460.
Weiskrantz, L. (1986),Blindsight: A Case Study and Implications, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1958),Philosophical Investigations, translated by G.E.M. Anscombe, Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hauser, L. Reaping the whirlwind: Reply to Harnad's “other bodies, other minds”. Mind Mach 3, 219–237 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00975533
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00975533