References
Abrams, M. H. 1988a. The deconstructive angel.Pages 265–276of: Lodge, David (ed),Modern criticism and theory: A reader. London and New York: Longman.
Abrams, M. H. 1988b.A glossary of literary terms. Fifth edn. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Bechert, Heinz. 1973. Notes on the formation of Buddhist sects and the origins of the Mahāyāna.Pages 6–18of:German scholars on India, vol. 1 Varanasi: Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series Office.
Bhattacharya, Kamaleswar. 1984. La signification du madhyamaka: Reconsidération des arguments de Nāgārjuna contre le mouvement.Chap. Mexico, pages 189–199 of: memoria del Primer Simposio Internacional de Lengua Sánscrita: (ed),Cultura sánscrita: memoria del Primer Simposio Interacional de Lengua Sánscrita. Mexico.
Bhattacharya, Kamaleswar. 1985. Nāgārjuna's arguments against motion.Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 8(1), 7–16.
Bugault, Guy. 1983. Logic and dialectics in the Madhyamakakārikās.Journal of Indian Philosophy 11, 7–76.
Chakrabarti, Sitansu S. 1980. The Mādhyamika catu\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)ko\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)i or tetralemma.Journal of Indian Philosophy 8, 303–306.
De Jong, J.-W. 1950. Le probléme de l'absolu dans l'école madhyamika.Revue philosophique 140, 322–327.
Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Structure, sign and play in the discourse of the human sciences.Pages 108–123of: Lodge, David (ed),Modem criticism and theory: A reader. London and New York: Longman.
Galloway, Brian. 1989. Some logical issues in Madhyamaka thought.Journal of Indian Philosophy 17(1), 1–36.
Hayes, Richard P. 1988.Dignāga on the interpretation of signs. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Huffman, F. J. 1982. Rationality in early Buddhist four fold logic.Journal of Indian Philosophy 10, 309–337.
Huntington, C. W., Jr, & Wangchen, Geshe Namgyal. 1989.The emptiness of emptiness: an introduction to early Indian Madhyamika. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Inada, Kenneth K. 1970.Nāgārjuna: A translation of His MŪla-madhyamakakārikā. Tokyo: Hokuseido Press.
Ingalls, Daniel H. H. 1954. A comparison of Indian and Western philosophy.Journal of oriental research (Madras)22, 1–11.
Kalupahana, David J. 1975.Causality: The central philosophy of Buddhism. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
Kalupahana, David J. 1976.Buddhist philosophy: a historical analysis. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
Kalupahana, David J. 1986.Nāgārjuna: The philosophy of the middle way. SUNY series in Buddhist studies. Albany, N. Y.: State University of New York Press. Includes translation of Nāgārjuna'sMŪla-madhyamakakārikā, pp. 101–391.
La Vallée Poussin, Louis de. 1933. Réflexions sur le Madhyamaka.Mélanges chinois et bouddhiques 2, 1–59.
Lindtner, Christian. 1986.Master of wisdom: Writings of the Buddhist master Nāgārjuna. Tibetan translation series. (Berkeley, Calif.): Dharma Pub.
Lindtner, Christian. 1987.Nāgārjuniana: Studies in the writings and philosophy of Nāgārjuna. 1st Indian edn. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984.After virtue: A study in moral theory. Second edn. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.
Magliola, Robert. 1984.Derrida on the mend. West Lafayette, Indiana: Purdue University Press.
Morris, Richard (ed). 1885.The Anguttara-nikāya. Part 1: ekanipāta, dukanipāta and tikanipāta. London: Pali Text Society.
Murti, T. R. V. 1960.The central philosophy of Buddhism: a study of the Mādhyamika system. Reprint of second edn. London: unwin paperbacks, 1980.
Ng, Yu-Kwan. 1987. The arguments of Nāgārjuna in the light of modern logic.Journal of Indian Philosophy 15(4), 363–384.
Nishida, KitarŌ. 1987.Last writings: Nothingness and the religious worldview. First English language edn. Translation, by David A. Dilworth, ofBashoteki ronri to shŪkyŌteki sekaikan andWatakushi no ronri ni tsuite, two works originally published posthumously in 1959. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Pāndeya, Raghunāth (ed). 1988.MadhyamakaŚāstram: sambhotabhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)abhā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)ayā sa\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m}\)sk\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\)te rŪpāntarĪkam. Edited with reconstructions of Nāgārjuna's Akutobhayā, Buddha-pālita's Madhyamakav\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\)tti, and Bhāvaviveka's PrajñāpradĪpav\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\)tti and a Sanskrit edition of CandrakĪrti's Prasannapadāv\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\)tti. Delhi: MotĪlāl BanārsĪdās.
Raschke, Carl A. 1990. Fire and roses: Toward authentic post-modern religious thinking.Journal of the American Academy of Religions 53(4), 671–689.
Robinson, Richard H. 1957. Some logical aspects of Nāgārjuna's system.Philosophy East and West 6(4), 291–308.
Robinson, Richard H. 1972a. Did Nāgārjuna really refute all philosophical views?Philosophy East and West 22(3), 325–331.
Robinson, Richard H. 1972b. Some methodological approaches to the unexplained points.Philosophy East and West 22(1), 309–323.
Ruegg, D. Seyfort. 1977. The uses of the four positions of the catu\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)ko\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)i and the problem of the description of reality in Mahāyāna Buddhism.Journal of Indian philosophy 5, 1–71.
Ruegg, David Seyfort. 1981.The literature of the Mādhyamaka school of philosophy in India. History of Indian literature, vol. 7, fasc. 1. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
Ruegg, David Seyfort, & Schmithausen, Lambert (ed). 1990.Earliest Buddhism and Mādhyamaka. Panels of the VIIth World Sanskrit Conference, Kern Institute, Leiden: August 23–29, 1987. General Editor: Johannes Bronkhorst. Vol 2. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Schayer, Stainslaw. 1931.AusgewÄhlte Kapitel aus der Prasannapadā: Einleitung, übersetzung und Anmerkungen. Polska Akademja UmiejetnoŚci. Prace Komisji Orjentalistycznej, 14. Krakow: W Krakowie Nakładem Pólskiej Akademji UmiejetnoŚci. German translation of chapters 5, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16.
Siderits, Mark. 1980. Review of David J. Kalupahana's Causality: The central philosophy of Buddhism.Journal of Indian philosophy 8, 191–197.
Siderits, Mark, & O'Brien, J. Dervin. 1976. Zeno and Nāgārjuna on motion.Philosophy East and West 26, 281–299.
Smith, Huston. 1990. Postmodernism's impact on the study of religion.Journal of the American Academy of Religions 53(4), 653–670.
Sprung, Mervyn. 1979.Lucid exposition of the middle way: The essential chapters from the Prasannapadā of CandrakĪrti. Translated in collaboration with T. R. V. Murti and U. S. Vyas. Boulder, Colorado: Prajna Press.
Staal, J. F. 1976. Making sense of the Buddhist tetralemma.Pages 122–131of: Lewis, H. D. (ed),Philosophy East and West: Essays in honour of Dr. T. M. P. Mahadevan. Bombay: Blackie & Son (India) Limited.
Stcherbatsky, Th. 1927. The conception of Buddhist nirvā\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{n}\)a. Revised and enlarged edn. Varanasi: Bharatiya Vidya Parkashan, 1968(7).
Streng, Frederick J. 1967.Emptiness: a study in religious meaning. Nashville: Abingdon Press.
Tillemans, Tom J. F. 1992. La logique bouddique est-elle une logique non-classique ou déviante? Remarques sur le tétralemme(catu \(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s}\)ko\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{t}\)i).Les cahiers de philosophie, 183–198.
Tuck, Andrew P. 1990.Comparative philosophy and the philosophy of scholarship: On the Western interpretation of Nāgārjuna. New York: Oxford University Press.
Vaidya, P. L. (ed). 1960. MadhyamakaŚāstram: ācāryacandraklrtiviracitatā prasanna-padākhyavyākhyayā sa\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m}\)valitam. Buddha-sa\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m}\)sk\(\underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{r}\)ta-granthāvalĪ, 10. Darbhanga: MithilāvidyāpĪtha.
Warder, A. K. 1970.Indian Buddhism. First edn. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Williams, Paul. 1989.Mahāyāna Buddhism: The doctrinal foundations. The Library of Religious Beliefs and Practices. London and New York: Routledge.
Williams, Paul. 1991. On the interpretation of Madhyamaka thought.Journal of Indian Philosophy 19(2), 191–218.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hayes, R.P. Nāgārjuna's appeal. J Indian Philos 22, 299–378 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01095223
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01095223