Skip to main content
Log in

Civic Friendship

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper seeks to examine the plausibility of the concept of ‘Civic Friendship’ as a philosophical model for a conceptualisation of ‘belonging’. Such a concept, would hold enormous interest for educators in enabling the identification of particular virtues, attitudes and values that would need to be taught and nurtured to enable the civic relationship to be passed on from generation to generation. I consider both of the standard arguments for civic friendship: that it can be understood within the Aristotelian typology as either a form of utility friendship or as a form of virtue friendship. I argue that civic friendship may not be the most appropriate model and that attempts to resolve the problems through looking on it as a political metaphor leave it unable to fulfil the function for which it was originally designed in Ancient Greece. Finally, I emphasize the need to carefully consider which particular metaphors we choose for civic relationships and how we subsequently use them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jan/29/derek-conway-fined [last accessed 19.11.2009].

  2. "We don’t pay taxes. Only the little people pay taxes": attributed to Leona Helmsley, a U.S. hotel magnate tried for tax evasion. Quoted in New York Times (July 12, 1989). [last accessed 19.11.2009].

  3. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/mar/17/barclays-guardian-injunction-tax: article examining how numerous banks, the ultra-rich and multinational organisations avoided paying taxes.[last accessed 19.11.2009].

  4. On the 5th February, 2004, 21 Chinese cockle pickers, all illegal immigrants, were cut off by the tide and drowned at Morecambe Bay, UK because of the negligence of their gang master. The existence of gang-masters operating in the UK were unknown by most citizens prior to this event. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/lancashire/4259226.stm [last accessed 19.11.2009].

References

  • Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities (Revised ed.). London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, A. (1954). The Nicomachean Ethics. (D. Ross, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Baron, M. (1991). Impartiality and friendship. Ethics, 101(4), 836–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, D. (1997). Friendship and belonging. In R. L. Selman, C. L. Watts, & L. H. Schultz (Eds.), Fostering friendship: pair therapy for treatment and prevention (pp. 19–31). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, F. A., & De Landtsheer, C. l. (Eds) (2004), Metaphorical world politics: Mitchigan State University Press.

  • Bell, S., & Coleman, S. (1999). The anthropology of friendship: Enduring themes and future possibilities. In S. Bell & S. Coleman (Eds.), The anthropology of friendship. Oxford, New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, B., & La Gaipa, J. J. (1980). The development of friendship values and choice. In H. C. Foot, A. J. Chapman, & J. R. Smith (Eds.), Friendship and social relations in children (pp. 15–35). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, L. (1980). Friendship, altruism and morality. London; Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunkhorst, H. (2005). Solidarity. (J. Flynn, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Buchanan, A. (1990). Justice as reciprocity versus subject-centred justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19(3), 227–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, D., & Furman, W. (1987). The development of companionship and intimacy. Child Development, 58, 1101–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartledge, P. (1993). The Greeks: A portrait of self and others. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, P. (2007). Segregated neighbourhoods and mixed communities: a critical analysis. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocking, D., & Kennett, J. (2000). Friendship and moral danger. The Journal of Philosophy, 97(5), 278–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constant, B. (1806). Political writings. (1988 Ed.): Cambridge University Press.

  • Cooper, J. (1977a). Aristotle on the forms of friendship. Review of Metaphysics, XXX No 4(120), 619–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (1977b). Friendship and the good in Aristotle. Philosophical Review, LXXXVI(3), 290–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (1991). Friendship. In L. Becker (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of Ethics (Vol. 1, pp. 388–391). New York and London: Garland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (1999). Reason and emotion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneen, P. J. (2001). Friendship and politics: Ancient and American. In P. J. Bathory & N. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Essays in honour of Wilson Carey McWilliams (pp. 47–66). Oxford: Rowland and Littlewood Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • diZerega, G. (2003). Scale and magnanimity in liberal theory: reflections on civic liberalism. [Online]. Available at: http://dizerega.com/poli.html. [Last accessed March 2004].

  • Fletcher, G. P. (1993). Loyalty—an essay on the morality of relationships. New York Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortier, T. L. (1971). Aristotle on social friendships. Laval Theologique et Philosophique, 27, 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, R. (2005). Social perspective-taking, intimate friendship, and the adolescent transition to mutualistic moral judgement. Ohio: The Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansot, E. (2000). Civic friendship: An Aristotelian perspective. In L. Cuban & D. Shipps (Eds.), Reconstructing the common good in education (pp. 171–185). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, B. (2005). Friendship. [Online]. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2005/entries/friendship/. [Last accessed 23.5.10].

  • Herman, G. (1987). Ritualised friendship and the Greek city. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honohan, I. (2008). Metaphors of solidarity. In T. Carver & J. Pikalo (Eds.), Political language and metaphor: interpreting and changing the world (pp. 69–82). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, H. (1978). Politics as friendship. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfred Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeske, D. (1997). Friendship, virtue, and impartiality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, LVII(1), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konstan, D. (1997). Friendship in the classical world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (2002). A figure of thought. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1(3), 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, R. (2003). The value in friendship. Philosophical Investigations, 26(1), 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunt, N. (2005). A note on political science and the metaphorical imagination. Politics, 25(2), 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, S. (2005). Philosophy and friendship. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, A. (1997). Special obligations to compatriots. Ethics, 107, 427–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, C. (2006). ‘Trust’. [Online]. The Stanford Encycopedia of Philosophy. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/trust/.

  • Miller, E. F. (1979). Metaphor and political knowledge. The American Political Science Review, 73(1), 150–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mio, J. S. (1997). Metaphor and politics. Metaphor and Symbol, 12(2), 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, K. (2004). Trust: From Socrates to spin. Cambridge: Icon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, B., & Muir, R. (2007). The power of belonging: Identity, citizenship and cohesion. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenbach, S. (2009). On civic friendship: Including women in the state. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selman, R. L., Watts, C. L., & Schultz, L. H. (1997). Fostering friendship: Pair therapy for treatment and prevention. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spragens, T. A. (1999). Civic liberalism. Oxford and New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. (2001). Education, fraternity, and social cohesion: A liberal argument about civic values. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2004). Modern social imaginaries. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. (1987). Friendship. Synthese, 72(2), 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. (1993). Friendship and other loves. In N. K. Badhwar (Ed.), Friendship: A philosophical reader (pp. 48–64). Cornell: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, E. (1985). Explanation of ideology: Family structures and social systems (family, sexuality and social relations in past times). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, M. (2005). The philosophy of friendship. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (1999). Friendship and commitment. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 33(1), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willson-Quayle, J. M. (1991). Hobbes, metaphor and political thought. London: London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to all who took part in the Second Stanford-Illinois Summer School and at The Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain conference in 2006 for their comments on an earlier version of this paper. Many thanks to Patricia White and Professor Suzy Harris for their insights and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Healy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Healy, M. Civic Friendship. Stud Philos Educ 30, 229–240 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-011-9221-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-011-9221-3

Keywords

Navigation