Skip to main content
Log in

The reduction of sensory pleasure to desire

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the leading approaches to the nature of sensory pleasure reduces it to desire: roughly, a sensation qualifies as a sensation of pleasure just in case its subject wants to be feeling it. This approach is, in my view, correct, but it has never been formulated quite right; and it needs to defended against some compelling arguments. Thus the purpose of this paper is to discover the most defensible formulation of this rough idea, and to defend it against the most interesting objections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston, W. (1967). Pleasure. In: P. Edwards (Ed.), The encyclopedia of philosophy (pp. 341–347). New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. & The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, T. Summa Theologica.

  • Brandt, R. B. (1979). A theory of the good and the right. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, C.D. (1930). Five types of ethical theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Carson, T. L. (2000). Value and the good life. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. (1982). A causal theory of enjoyment. Mind, 91, 240–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, K. (1941). On pleasure, emotion, and striving. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1, 391–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, F. (1997). Two Questions about Pleasure. In F. Feldman, (Eds.), Utilitarianism, hedonism, and desert: Essays in moral philosophy (pp. 82–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, F. (2001). Hedonism. In L. C. Becker, & C. B. Becker, (Eds.), The encyclopedia of ethics. New York: Routledge, pp. 662–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. J. (1989). Are pains necessarily unpleasant?. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 49, 643–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heathwood, C. (2006). Desire satisfactionism and hedonism, Philosophical Studies, 128, 539–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. (1992). The limits of well-being. Social Philosophy and Policy, 9, 169–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A. (1963). Action, emotion, and will. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Korsgaard, C. M. (1996): The sources of normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, G. B., & Cohen, S. M. (1967). Wants and lacks. The Journal of Philosophy, 64, 455–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1998). In R. Crisp (Ed.), Utilitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Moore, G. E. (1993). In T. Baldwin (Ed.), Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, D.L. (1967). The concept of pleasure. The Hague: Mouton.

  • Rachels, S. (2000). Is unpleasantness intrinsic to unpleasant experiences?. Philosophical Studies, 99, 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, S. (2004). Six theses about pleasure. Philosophical Perspectives, 18, 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. (1907). The methods of ethics, 7th edn. Macmillan.

  • Sobel, D. (2002). Varieties of hedonism. Journal of Social Philosophy, 33, 240–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. (1871). The principles of psychology. New York: D. Appleton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprigge, T. (1988). The rational foundations of ethics. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, L. W. (1996). Welfare, happiness, & ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, L. W. (1998). Review of Fred Feldman, Utilitarianism, hedonism, and desert: Essays in moral philosophy. Ethics, 109, 176–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Heathwood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heathwood, C. The reduction of sensory pleasure to desire. Philos Stud 133, 23–44 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9004-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-006-9004-9

Keywords

Navigation