Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular biology vs. organicism: The enduring dispute between mechanism and vitalism

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  1. ‘Mechanism and Vitalism as Meta-theoretical Commitments’, Philosophical Forum 1, 2 (Winter, 1968) 185.

  2. J. D. Watson, The Molecular Biology of the Gene, W. A. Benjamin, New York, 1965, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. E. Wooldridge, The Machinery of Life, New York, 1966, p. 42.

  4. E. Sinnott, The Problem of Organic Form, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 194.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Crick, Molecules and Men, University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1966, p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cited in ‘The Cell and the Organism: A Re-examination’ by Sister Adrian Marie, O.P., in Philosophical Problems in Biology (ed. by V. E. Smith), St. John's University Philosophical Series, No. 5, New York, 1966.

  9. B. Commoner, ‘In Defense of Biology’, Science 133 (1961) 1745–48.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. D. Bernal, The Origin of Life, World Publishing Co., Cleveland and New York, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Needham, Time: The Refreshing River, 2nd ed., Allen & Unwin, London, 1948, p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Wald, ‘The Origin of Life’, Scientific American, Aug. 1954.

  13. J. Keosian, The Origin of Life, Reinhold, New York, 1964. See also Science 131 (1960) 479.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. I. Oparin, The Origin of Life (trans. by S. Morgulis), Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. I. Oparin, The Origin of Life on Earth (trans. by A. Synge), Academic Press Inc., New York, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. I. Oparin, Life, Its Nature, Origin and Development (trans. by A. Synge), Academic Press, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. L. Miller, Science 117 (1953) 528.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. L. Miller, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77 (1955) 2351.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Weiss, ‘The Cell as Unit’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 5 (1963) 389–97.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Y. Lettvin, H. R. Maturana, W. H. Pitts, and W. S. McCulloch, ‘Two Remarks on the Visual System of the Frog’, in Sensory Communication (ed. by W. A. Rosenblith), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Journal of Theoretical Biology 20 (1968) 338–340.

  22. J. Kendrew, Review of Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology, in Scientific American 216 (1967), March issue.

  23. G. Stent, Phage and the Origins of Molecular Biology (ed. by J. C. Cairns, G. S. Stent, and J. D. Watson), Cold Springs Harbor Laboratory of Quantitative Biology, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. O. Schmitt, Science 149 (1965) 932, 3687.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hein, H. Molecular biology vs. organicism: The enduring dispute between mechanism and vitalism. Synthese 20, 238–253 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413789

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413789

Keywords

Navigation