Skip to main content
Log in

Syntax-directed discovery in mathematics

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is shown how mathematical discoveries such as De Moivre's theorem can result from patterns among the symbols of existing formulae and that significant mathematical analogies are often syntactic rather than semantic, for the good reason that mathematical proofs are always syntactic, in the sense of employing only formal operations on symbols. This radically extends the Lakatos approach to mathematical discovery by allowing proof-directed concepts to generate new theorems from scratch instead of just as evolutionary modifications to some existing theorem. The emphasis upon syntax and proof permits discoveries to go beyond the limits of any prevailing semantics. It also helps explain the shortcomings of inductive AI systems of mathematics learning such as Lenat's AM, in which proof has played no part in the formation of concepts and conjectures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Birkhoff, G.: 1969, ‘Mathematics and Psychology’,SIAM Review 11(4), 429–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, A.: 1983,Computer Modelling of Mathematical Reasoning, Academic Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P.: 1963, ‘The Evolution of the Physicist's Picture of Nature’,Scientific American 208(5), 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J.: 1949,An Essay on the Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field, Princeton U.P., Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, G. H.: 1948,A Mathematician's Apology, Cambridge.

  • Henley, D. S.: 1992, ‘Mathematical Intuition and Wittgenstein’, inNew Thinking about the Nature of Mathematics, School of Education, University of East Anglia, p. 39.

  • Huntley, H. E.: 1970,The Divine Proportion: A Study in Mathematical Beauty, Dover.

  • Kitcher, P.: 1984,The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge, O.U.P., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1976,Proofs and Refutations, C.U.P., Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D.: 1982, ‘AM: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Discovery in Mathematics as Heuristic Search’, inKnowledge Based Systems in Artificial Intelligence, McGraw-Hill, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D.: 1983, ‘EURISKO: A Program That Learns New Heuristics and Domain Concepts’,Artificial Intelligence 21, 61–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minton, S., Carbonell, J., Knoblock, C., Kuokka, D., Etzioni, O., Gil, Y.: 1989, ‘Explanation-Based Learning: A Problem Solving Perspective’,Artificial Intelligence 40, 63–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S.: 1978, ‘The Mathematical Unconscious’, in Weschler (ed.),On Aesthetics in Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R.: 1974, ‘The Role of Aesthetics in Pure and Applied Mathematical Research’,Bulletin of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications 10(7/8), 266–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R.: 1989,The Emperor's New Mind, Oxford, Chap 4.

  • Poincaré, H.: 1908,Science and Method, Thomas Nelson.

  • Polya, G.: 1954,Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning, Vol. I, O.U.P., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1921,Tractatus Logico-Philosopohicus, RKP, London (1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Henley, D.S. Syntax-directed discovery in mathematics. Erkenntnis 43, 241–259 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128198

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128198

Keywords

Navigation