Abstract
Turing tersely mentioned a notion of ``cultural search'' while otherwise deeply engaged in the design and operations of one of the earliest computers. His idea situated the individual squarely within a collaborative intellectual environment, but did he mean to suggest this in the form of a general information system? In the same writing Turing forecast mechanizations of proofs and outlined genetical searches, much later implemented in cellular automata. The conjecture explores the networked data-information-knowledge continuum as the subject of Turing's notions of search and intelligence, using analogous models from library systems theory. Floridi's philosophy of information is posed as a potential guide to applied information services design of the Turing type. The initial problem is to identify a minimal set of assumptions from Turing's essay beyond the general context of computing. This set will form a bridge to an analogous set of principles in library systems models by eliciting supporting evidence in the literature relating the two. Finally it will be shown how Floridi's philosophy of information more fully encompasses Turing's insight in view of the conjecture.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrechtsen, H. and Jacob, E.K. (1998), ‘The Dynamics of Classification System as Boundary Objects for Cooperation in the Electronic Library’, Library Trends 47(2), pp. 293–312.
Arms, W.Y., Blanchi, C., and Overly, E.A. (1997), ‘An Architecture for Information in Digital Libraries’ D-Lib Magazine, February.
Ashenhurst, R.L. (1996), ‘Ontological Aspects of Information Modeling’, Minds and Machines 6, pp. 287–394.
Blair, D.C. (2002), ‘Information Retrieval and the Philosophy of Language’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37.
Bonnevie, E. (2001), ‘Dretske's Semantic Information Theory and Meta-Theories in Library and Information Science’ Journal of Documentation 57(4), pp. 519–534.
Buckland, M. (1997), ‘What is a ‘Document?’ Journal of the American Society of Information Science 48(9).
Budd, J. (2001), Knowledge and Knowing in Library and Information Science: A Philosophical Framework, Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
Capurro, R. and Hjørland, B. (2002), ‘The Concept of Information’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 37.
Churchman, C.W. (1971), The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization, New York: Basic Books.
Cornelius, I. (2002), ‘Theorizing Information for Information Science’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36.
Davenport, E. (1992), ‘What Do We Do When We Do Information Science?” in P. Vakkari and B. Cronin, eds., Conceptions of Library and Information Science: Historical, Empirical, and Theoretical Perspectives, London, Los Angeles: T. Graham.
Dovey, M.J. (1999), ‘Meta-Objects: An Object Oriented Approach to Metadata’, Ariadne 19 (March).
Engelbart, D.C. (1992), ‘Toward High-Performance Organizations: A Strategic Role for Groupware', Bootstrap Institute, June.
Floridi, L. (1999), Philosophy and Computing: An Introduction, London, New York: Routledge.
Floridi, L. (2002) ‘On Defining Library and Information Science as Applied Philosophy of Information’, Social Epistemology 16(11), pp. 37–49
Floridi, L. (2003), ‘On the Intrinsic Value of Information Objects and the Infosphere’, Ethics and Information Technology 4(4), pp. 287–304
Floridi, L. (2004), ‘Open Problems in the Philosophy of Information’, Metaphilosophy 35(3).
Floridi, L. and Sanders J. (2003), ‘Internet Ethics: The Constructionist Values of Homo Poieticus', in R. Cavalier, The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives, Albany: SUNY Press.
Giere, R.N. (2002), ‘Models as Parts of Distributed Cognitive Systems', in Magnani and Nersessian, eds., Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values, New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers/Plenum.
Herold, K.R. (2001), ‘Librarianship and the Philosophy of Information’, Library Philosophy and Practice 3(2), [http://www.uidaho.edu/ mbolin/herold.pdf].
Hjørland, B. (1998), ‘Information Retrieval, Text Composition, and Semantics’, Knowledge Organization 25(1/2), pp. 16–31.
Hjørland, B. (2000), ‘Library and Information Science: Practice, Theory, and Philosophical Basis’, Information Processing and Management 36, pp. 501–531.
Hodges, A. (1983), Alan Turing: The Enigma, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Howe, D. (1994), ‘The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing', 1993–2001.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (LTSC), IEEE P1484.12 Learning Object Metadata Working Group. Standard for Information Technology — Education and Training Systems — Learning Objects and Metadata. Approved 10 December 2002. [http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/]
Ingwersen (2001), ‘Cognitive Information Retrieval’, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 34, pp. 1999–2000.
Kircz, J.G. (2001), ‘New Practices for Electronic Publishing 1: Will the Scientific Paper Keep Its Form?’ Learned Publishing 14 (October).
Kircz, J.G. (2002), ‘New Practices for Electronic Publishing 2: New Forms of the Scientific Paper’, Learned Publishing 15(1), (January).
Kochen, M. (1962), ‘Adaptive Mechanisms in Digital ‘Concept’ Processing', in The Growth of Knowledge: Readings on Organization and Retrieval of Information, New York: Wiley.
Kochen (1966), ‘Systems Technology for Information Retrieval’ in The Growth of Knowledge: Readings on Organization and Retrieval of Information, New York: Wiley.
Kochen (1974), Principle of Information Retrieval, New York: Wiley.
Le Boeuf, P. (2001), ‘FRBR and Further’, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 32(4).
Lubetzky and Hayes (1969), ‘Bibliographic Dimensions in Information Control’, American Documentation 20(3), (July).
Lynch, M. (1997), ‘Towards a Paradigm of Information System’, Philosophical Aspects of Information Systems. Winder, Probert and Beeson, eds., London: Taylor & Francis.
Maly, K., Nelson, M.L. and Zubair, M. (1999), ‘Smart Objects, Dumb Archives: A User-Centric, Layered Digital Library Framework’, D-Lib Magazine 5(3), (March).
Mooers, C. (1951), ‘Information Retrieval Viewed as Temporal Signalling', in International Congress of Mathematicians. Cambridge, Mass., 1950. Proceedings, Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, vol. 1.
Nitecki, J.Z. (1993), Metalibrarianship: A Model for Intellectual Foundations of Library Information Science. http://www7.twu.edu/library/nitecki/metalibrarianship/index.html
Nitecki, J.Z. (1995), Philosophical Aspects of Library Information Science in Retrospect. http://www7.twu.edu/library/nitecki/aspects/index.html
Nitecki, Joseph Z. (1997), Philosophical Ancestry of the American Library Informationhttp://www7.twu.edu/library/nitecki/ancestry/index.html
Nitecki, J.Z. (1998), ‘Conceptual Aspects of Bibliothecal Communication; Philosophical Legacy of the Twentieth Century American Librarianship’, Public Library Quarterly 17(1).
Peckham, J. and Maryanski, F. (1988), ‘Semantic Data Models’, ACM Computing Surveys 20(3) (September).
Reinhardt, A. (1994), ‘Managing the New Document’, Byte 19(8), (August).
Renear, A., Mylonas, E. and Durand, D. (1996) ‘Refining our Notion of What Text Really Is: The Problem of Overlapping Hierarchies', in N. Ide and S. Hockey, eds., Research in Humanities Computing, Oxford University Press.
Sloman, A. (1978), The Computer Revolution in Philosophy, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Smiraglia, R.P. (2002), Special Issue on Works as Entities for Information Retrieval, Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 33(3/4).
Smith, B. (2003), ‘Ontology', in L. Floridi ed., Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information, (forthcoming).
Sowa, J.F. (2002), ‘Architectures for Intelligent Systems', Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence, IBM Systems Journal 41(3), pp. 331–349.
Steinhart, E. (1998), ‘Digital Metaphysics', in T.W. Bynum and J.H. Moor, eds., The Digital Phoenix: How Computers are Changing Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell.
Turing, A.M. (1948) ‘Intelligent Machinery', Technical Report, National Physical Laboratory. (Written in September, 1947). In Machine Intelligence 5. Edinburgh University Press, 1969.
Van den Akker, J. and Siebes, A. (1997), ‘Degas: A Database of Autonomous Objects’, Information Systems 22(2/3), pp. 121–138.
Veltman, K. (1999), Frontiers in Conceptual Navigation 2: Interfaces for Cultural Heritage, Totonto: Ontario Library Association.
Vickery, B.C. (1973), ‘The Nature of Information Science', in C.H. Rawski, ed., Toward a Theory of Librarianship: Papers in Honor of Jesse Hauk Shera, Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow.
Von Foerster, H. (1971), ‘Technology: What Will It Mean to Librarians [A Response]', in Observing Systems, 2nd edition, Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications.
Weinberg, A. (1963). ‘Science, Government, and Information', in Science, Government, and Information: The Responsibilities of the Technical Community and the Government in the Transfer of Information. President's Science Advisory Council, U.S.: Government Printing Office. Washington, DC, pp. 7–37.
Weyrauch, R. (1991), ‘Ideas on Building Conscious Artifacts', Edited version of talk given to the Workshop on Consciousness, Venice, June 1991. http://www-formal.stanford.edu/FOL/rww-91con-work [retrieved 1/29/2003]
Williams, J.G. (1996), ‘Information Science: A Proposed Model for Curriculum Development’ in Information Science: Still An Emerging Discipline, Pittsburgh: Cathedral Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herold, K. An Information Continuum Conjecture. Minds and Machines 13, 553–566 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026204901999
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026204901999