Skip to main content
Log in

Delayed-choice experiments and retroactive apparent occurrence in the quantum theory of measurement

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of retroactive apparent occurrence, the main ingredient of Wheeler's delayed-choice thought experiments, is systematically incorporated into the quantum theory of measurement (in the framework of the recent review of Busch, Lahti, and Mittelstaedt). Besides, the (general) notion of individual-system measurement is introduced, and, due to it, premeasurement is defined by a truly minimal condition. Finally, retroactive apparent occurrence is made use of to derive apparent objectification in measurement. The derivation is discussed in the framework of the quantum mechanical approach to the objectification problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. A. Wheeler, inQuantum Theory and Measurement, J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, eds. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983), p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Vujičić and F. Herbut,J. Math. Phys. 25, 2253 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Busch, P. J. Lahti, and P. Mittelstaedt,The Quantum Theory of Measurement (Lecture Notes in PhysicsM2) (Springer, Berlin, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Lüders,Ann. Phys. 8, 322 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Herbut,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 25, 1215 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Herbut,Am. J. Phys. 60, 146 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Herbut,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 11, 193 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Hadjisavvas,Lett. Math. Phys. 5, 327 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Durdević, M. Vujičić, and F. Herbut,J. Math. Phys. 32, 3088 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. F. Mott,Proc. R. Soc. London A 126, 79 (1929); reprinted inQuantum Theory and Measurement, J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, eds. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983), p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. J. Groenewold, inObservation and Interpretation in the Philosophu of Physics, S. Körner, ed. (Dover, New York, 1957), p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Pearle,Am. J. Phys. 35, 742 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. A. Moldauer,Phys. Rev. D 5, 1028 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. R. Fox,Am. J. Phys. 51, 49 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. E. Ballentine,Found. Phys. 20, 1329 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Herbut,J. Phys. A 24, 1785 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. H. Furry,Phys. Rev. 49, 393 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. M. Jauch,Helv. Phys. Acta 37, 293 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. M. Jauch,Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, London, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Herbut,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 25, 863 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. J. Bohm, C. Dewdney, and B. J. Hiley,Nature (London) 315, 294 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. Marinković and M. Damnjanović,Phys. Lett. A 125, 173 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herbut, F. Delayed-choice experiments and retroactive apparent occurrence in the quantum theory of measurement. Found Phys 24, 117–137 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053911

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053911

Keywords

Navigation