Abstract
Technology and terminology often detract from a reasoned appraisal of the euthanasia option, especially in those discussions that argue for euthanasia's incorporation into a beneficence-based medical model. “Beneficent euthanasia,” assuming there is such a thing, poses special challenges to the traditional provider-patient relationship. These challenges argue for well-defined limits of beneficence and a more equitable distribution of responsibility between participants. We should not allow technology and terminology to generate an unrealistic portrayal of patient death and its ramifications. Participants need to acknowledge their roles in the decision to kill and the obligations that those roles entail. Perhaps we can reach ethical consensus concerning euthanasia by first reasserting our span of control over the technology that can extend the near-death period and by openly discussing euthanasia's implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahms, N. (1982). Scope of beneficence in health care. In E. E. Shelp (Ed.),Beneficence and health care (pp. 183–198). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing.
Annonymous. (1988). It's over Debbie,Journal of the American Medical Association,259, 2, 272.
Bernards, N. (Ed.). (1989).Euthanasia: Opposing viewpoints. San Diego, CA: Greenhaven Press.
Cassell, C. K. & Meier, D. E. (1991). Morals and moralism in the debate over euthanasia and assisted suicide.New England Journal of Medicine, 323, 11, 750–752.
Duff, R. A. (1982). Intention, responsibility, and double effect.Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 1–16.
Jones, G. E. (1982). The doctor-patient relationship and euthanasia.Journal of Medical Ethics, 8, 195–198.
Mall, D. (1977). Death and the rhetoric of unknowing. In D. J. Horan & D. Mall (Eds.),Death, dying, and euthanasia (pp. 647–668). Washington, DC: University Publications of America.
Marsh, F. H. & Yarborough, M. (1990).Medicine and money: A study of the role of beneficence in health care cost containment. NY: Greenwood Press.
Mason, J. K. (1988).Human life and medical practice. Edinburgh: University Press.
Mumford, L. (1934).Technics and civilization. NY: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
Ogden, C. K. & Richards, I. A. (1938).The meaning of meaning. NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Pellegrino, E. D. & Thomasma, D. C. (1988).For the patient's good. NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
Pence, G. E. (1990).Classical cases in medical ethics (Chap. 1). NY: McGraw-Hill.
Rie, M. A. (1991). Defining the limits of institutional moral agency in health care. A response to Kevin Wildes.Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 16, 2, 221–224.
Schneider, L. J. (1991). Euthanasia: Can we keep it a special case?The Humanist, 50, 3, 15–18.
Singer, P. (1979). Unsanctifying life. In J. Ladd (Ed.),Ethical issues relating to life and death (pp. 41–61). NY: Oxford Univ. Press.
Veatch, R. M. (1981).A theory of medical ethics. NY: Basic Books.
Williams, S. D. (1872). Euthanasia.The Popular Science Monthly, 3, 90–96.
Wreen, M. (1988). The definition of euthanasia.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 48, 637–654.
Young, R. (1979). What's so wrong with killing people?Philosophy, 54, 515–528.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herrera, C. Some ways that technology and terminology distort the euthanasia issue. J Med Hum 14, 23–31 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01138158
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01138158