Abstract
Communication on the Internet is often described as “anonymous”, yet the usage of the term is often confusing, even in academia. Three levels of anonymity, visual anonymity, dissociation of real and online identities, and lack of identifiability, are thought to have different effects on various components of interpersonal motivation. Specifically, we propose that cross-cultural differences in interpersonal motivation (autonomy vs. affiliation) are illustrated by choices individuals make when deciding whether or not to remain anonymous while communicating online. Autonomy is often valued in Western societies, whereas Eastern societies tend to emphasize affiliation, suggesting that individuals in Western societies will gravitate toward online communities that allow lower levels of anonymity, while individuals in Eastern societies will be more likely to seek out online communities that promote higher levels of anonymity. The research presented in this article supports this notion, suggesting that we need to consider cultural differences when designing online communication systems and other communications technologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asch SE (1951) Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In: Guetzknow H (Ed) Groups, leadership, and men. Carnegie Press, Oxford
Azechi S (2005) Information humidity model: explanation of dual modes of community for social intelligence design. AI Soc 19:110–122
Culnan MJ, Markus ML (1987) Information technologies. In: Jablin FM, Putnam LL, Roberts KH, Porter LW (Eds) Handbook of organizational communication: an interdisciplinary perspective. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 420–443
Douglas K, McGarty C (2001) Identifiability and self-presentation: computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. Br J Soc Psychol 40:399–416
Fujihara N (2001) How to evaluate social intelligence design. In: Terano T, Nishida T, Namatame A, Tsumoto S, Ohsawa Y, Washio T (eds) New frontiers in artificial intelligence––Joint JSAI 2001 workshop post-proceedings, lecture notes in artificial intelligence 2253. Springer, Berlin
Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences. Sage, Beverly Hills
Joinson AN (2003) Understanding the psychology of internet behavior: virtual worlds, real lives. Palgrave, Basingstoke
Kiesler S, Siegel J, McGuire T (1984) Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Am Psychol 39:1123–1134
Lea M, Spears R, de Groot D (2001) Knowing me, knowing you: anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27:526–357
Markus H, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98:224–253
Matsumura N, Miura A, Shibanai Y, Ohsawa Y, Nishida T (2005) The dynamism of 2channel. AI Soc 19:84–92
Morio H, Latané B, Richardson D (2004) Interpersonal attraction from electronic self-disclosure: cumulative effect of CMC. Proceedings of the 3rd workshop on social intelligence design, 101–109
Nisbett RE (2003) The geography of thought. Free Press, New York
Nowak A, Vallacher RR (2002) Emergence of personality: personality stability through interpersonal synchronization. In: Cervone D, Mischell W (Eds) Advances in personality science. Guilford, New York
Oyserman D, Coon HM, Kemmelmeiser M (2002) Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 128:3–72
Postmes T, Spears R, Lea M (1998) Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE effects of computer-mediated communication. Communic Res 25:689–715
Takano Y, Osaka E (1999) An unsupported common view: comparing Japan and the US on individualism/collectivism. Asian J Soc Psychol 2:311–341
Turkle S (1995) Life on the screen: identity in the age of the internet. Simon & Schuster, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morio, H., Buchholz, C. How anonymous are you online? Examining online social behaviors from a cross-cultural perspective. AI & Soc 23, 297–307 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0143-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0143-0