Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Morality of Whistleblowing: A Commentary on Richard T. De George

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Although we refer to De George’s 7th edition of Business Ethics (2010), his criteria have not changed significantly from his 1st edition in 1982.

  2. In terms of financial motives, the issue is, however, potentially more relevant today in light of the U.S. Dodd-Frank Act which provides for significant monetary payouts to whistleblowers who report directly to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) even if they don’t report internally within their own firms (see Gilley and Hoffman 2011). The primary concern is that providing monetary incentives may motivate and thereby prevent many employees from reporting misconduct internally before going to the SEC.

  3. This could include illegal practices such as tax evasion, anti-competitive practices, fraud, environmental pollution, or deceptive advertising.

  4. See the National Whistleblowers Center at: http://www.whistleblowers.org/. Accessed on 23 May 2014.

  5. See: http://sec.gov/rules/final/2011/34-64545.pdf. Accessed on 23 May 2014.

  6. We place this as the second criterion as it appears to more closely follow the temporal order of the whistleblowing process: first harm must exist, leading to reasonable belief, then internal reporting.

References

  • Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2012). Report to the Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse: 2012 Global Fraud Study (Austin Texas). Available at: http://www.acfe.com/uploadedFiles/ACFE_Website/Content/rttn/2012-report-to-nations.pdf. Accessed on 23 May 2014.

  • Bowie, N. E. (1982). Business ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.

  • Davis, M. (1996). Some paradoxes of whistleblowing. Business & Professional Ethics Journal, 15(1). In Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N. E., & D. G. Arnold. (2009). Ethical theory and business (8th ed., pp. 147–155). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.

  • De George, R. T. (2010). Business ethics (7th ed., pp. 298–318). New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duska, R. (2009). Whistle-blowing and employee loyalty. In T. L. Beauchamp, N. E. Bowie, & D. G. Arnold (Eds.), Ethical theory and business (8th ed., pp. 155–159). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethics Resource Center. (2012). Inside the mind of a whistleblower. Washington DC. Available at: http://www.ethics.org/resource/inside-mind-whistleblower. Accessed on 23 May 2014.

  • Ethics Resource Center. (2014). National business ethics survey. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.ethics.org/nbes/. Accessed on 23 May 2014.

  • Gilley, M., & Hoffman, W. M. (2011). Will rewards for whistleblowers encourage ethical behavior? The CQ Researcher, 21, 409–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, L., & Desjardins, J. (2008). Business ethics: Decision-making for personal integrity & social responsibility. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassink, H., de Vries, M., & Bollen, L. (2007). A content analysis of whistleblowing policies of leading European companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, W. M., & McNulty, R. E. (2010). A business ethics theory of whistleblowing: Responding to the $1 trillion question. In M. Arszulowicz (Ed.), Whistleblowing: In defense of proper action (pp. 45–59). New York: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, W. M., & Rowe, M. (2007). Ethics officer as agent of the board. Business and Society Review, 112(4), 553–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, G. G. (1990). Whistle blowing: Its moral justification. In W. M. Hoffman, R. E. Frederick, & M. S. Schwartz (Eds.), Business ethics: Readings and cases in corporate morality (4th ed., pp. 291–302), 2001. New York: McGraw Hill.

  • Lewis, D. (2008). Ten years of public interest disclosure legislation in the UK: Are whistleblowers adequately protected? Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 497–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, L. (2007). Dissolving the moral dilemma of whistleblowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. S. (2013). Developing and sustaining an ethical corporate culture: The core elements. Business Horizons, 56, 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinzdak, G. (2008). An alaysis of current whistleblower laws: Defending a more flexible approach to reporting requirements. California Law Review, 96(6), 1633–1668.

  • U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2013). Organizations receiving fines or restitution. Sourcebook for Federal Sentencing Statistics. Available at: http://www.ussc.gov/research-and-publications/topical-index-publications/annual-reports-and-statistical-sourcebooks. Accessed on 23 May 2014.

  • Vandekerckhove, W., & Tsahuridu, E. E. (2010). Risky rescues and the duty to blow the whistle. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. G. (2006). Business ethics: Concepts and cases (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bentley University, Waltham, MA, USA

    W. Michael Hoffman

  2. York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Mark S. Schwartz

Authors
  1. W. Michael Hoffman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark S. Schwartz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Michael Hoffman.

Additional information

Authors’ names are listed alphabetically.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoffman, W.M., Schwartz, M.S. The Morality of Whistleblowing: A Commentary on Richard T. De George. J Bus Ethics 127, 771–781 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2186-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2186-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation