Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-llglr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-14T10:51:02.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Art appreciation and aesthetic feeling as objects of explanation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Patrick Colm Hogan*
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-4025. patrick.hogan@uconn.eduhttp://english.uconn.edu

Abstract

The target article presents a thought-provoking approach to the relation of neuroscience and art. However, at least two issues pose potential difficulties. The first concerns whether “art appreciation” is a coherent topic for scientific study. The second concerns the degree to which processing fluency can explain aesthetic feeling or may simply be one component of a more complex account.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arsalidou, M., Barbeau, E., Bayless, S. & Taylor, M. (2010) Brain responses differ to faces of mothers and fathers. Brain and Cognition 74:4751.Google Scholar
Beja, M. (1992) James Joyce: A literary life. Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. & Topolinski, S. (2011) An exploratory mindset reduces preference for prototypes and increases preference for novel exemplars. Cognition and Emotion 25:709–16.Google Scholar
Hogan, P. C. (forthcoming) Stylistics, emotion and neuroscience. In The Routledge handbook of stylistics. ed. Burke, M.. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hogan, P. C. (2011) What literature teaches us about emotion. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Miller, D. (1986) Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review 93:136–53.Google Scholar
Langlois, J. H. & Roggman, L. A. (1990) Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science 1:115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeDoux, J. (1996) The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. Touchstone.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. & Moore, K. (1988) Priming, prototypicality, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14:661–70.Google Scholar
Nadal, M., Munar, E., Capó, M., Rosselló, J. & Cela-Conde, C. (2008) Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference. Spatial Vision 21:379–96.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S. (2011) The tell-tale brain: A neuroscientist's quest for what makes us human. Norton.Google Scholar
Tan, E. (1995) Emotion and the structure of narrative film: Film as an emotion machine. Routledge.Google Scholar
Thaut, M. H. (2005) Rhythm, music, and the brain: Scientific foundations and clinical applications. Routledge.Google Scholar
Vartanian, O. & Goel, V. (2004) Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings. NeuroReport 15:893–97.Google Scholar
Vuust, P. & Kringelbach, M. (2010) The pleasure of music. In: Pleasures of the brain, ed. Kringelbach, M. & Berridge, K., pp. 255–69. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitfield, T. & Slatter, P. (1979) The effect of categorization and prototypicality on aesthetic choice in a furniture selection task. British Journal of Psychology 70:6775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar