Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:26:54.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Actions and accidents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

David Horst
David Horst*
Affiliation:
Martin Buber Society of Fellows, Mandel School for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Room 321/322, Mt. Scopus, Jerusalem91905, Israel
*
*Email: david.horst@mail.huji.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In acting intentionally, it is no accident that one is doing what one intends to do. In this paper, I ask how to account for this non-accidentality requirement on intentional action. I argue that, for systematic reasons, the currently prevailing view of intentional action – the Causal Theory of Action – is ill-equipped to account for it. I end by proposing an alternative account, according to which an intention is a special kind of cause, one to which it is essential that it represents its effect.

Keywords

intentional actioncausal theory of actionreasons as causesDonald DavidsonG.E.M. Anscombe
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , June 2015 , pp. 300 - 325
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, G. E. M. 2000. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, John. 1983. “Agent-causation.”; Mind XCII: 61–79.10.1093/mind/XCII.365.61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, John. 1989. Natural Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brand, Myles. 1984. Intending and Acting: Toward a Naturalized Action Theory. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making It Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. 1987. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. 1999. Faces of Intention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, Robert. 1975. “Functional Analysis.”; The Journal of Philosophy 72 (20): 741–765.10.2307/2024640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1963. “Actions, Reasons, and Causes.”; Reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1980.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1970. “Mental Events.”; In Experience and Theory, Reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. edited by Lawrence, Foster, and Swanson, J. W., London: Duckworth. 1980.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1973. “Freedom to Act.”; In Essays on Freedom of Action, Reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. edited by Ted, Honderich, London: Routledge. 1980.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1982. “Paradoxes of Irrationality.”; In Philosophical Essays on Freud, Reprinted in Problems of Rationality. edited by Wollheim, R., and Hopkins, J., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511554636Google Scholar
Davies, Martin. 1983. “Function in Perception.”; Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 409–426.10.1080/00048408312341161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enç, Berent. 2003. How We Act. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199256020.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falvey, Kevin. 2000. “Knowledge in Intention.”; Philosophical Studies 99 (1): 21–44.10.1023/A:1018775307559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Anton. 2011. “Action and Generality.”; In Essays on Anscombe's “Intention”;, edited by Ford, Anton, Hornsby, Jennifer, and Stoutland, Frederick, 76–104. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674060913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1978. “The Problem of Action.”; Reprinted in The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1988. The Importance of What We Care about. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511818172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haase, Matthias. “Knowledge and Error in Action.”; Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1976. “Practical Reasoning.”; Reprinted in The Philosophy of Action, edited by Mele, Alfred, 149–177. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. 2001. Simple Mindedness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Horst, David. 2012. Absichtliches Handeln. Paderborn: Mentis Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavin, Douglas. 2013. “Must There Be Basic Action?”; Noûs 47 (2): 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Eric. 2012. Rational Causation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674065338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Erasmus. 2011. Understanding Human Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606214.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mele, Alfred. 1992. Springs of Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Millikan, Ruth G. 1989. “In Defense of Proper Functions.”; Philosophy of Science 56: 288–302.10.1086/phos.1989.56.issue-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neander, Karen. 1991. “The Teleological Notion of ‘Function’.”; Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69: 454–468.10.1080/00048409112344881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neta, Ram, and Rohrbaugh, Guy. 2004. “Luminosity and the Safety of Knowledge.”; Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85: 396–406.10.1111/papq.2004.85.issue-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 1993. Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195078640.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, Duncan. 2005. Epistemic Luck. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/019928038X.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 2011. From Normativity to Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693818.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rödl, Sebastian. 2007. Self-consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university Press.Google Scholar
Schlosser, Markus E. 2007. “Basic Deviance Reconsidered.”; Analysis 67 (3): 186–194.10.1093/analys/67.3.186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 1983. Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John. 2001. Rationality in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Setiya, Kieran. 2007. Reasons without Rationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. 1987. “The Humean Theory of Motivation.”; Mind XCVI: 36–61.10.1093/mind/XCVI.381.36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. 1999. “How to Defeat Opposition to Moore.”; Philosophical Perspectives 13: 141–153.Google Scholar
Steward, Helen. 1997. The Ontology of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael. 2008. Life and Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674033962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, J. David. 1989. Practical Reflection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. David. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar