Skip to main content
Log in

Contents Just Are In The Head

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to show that semanticexternalism – the thesis that contents are notdetermined by ``individualistic'' features of mentalstates – is mistaken. Externalist thinking, it isargued, rests on two mistaken assumptions: theassumption that if there is an externalist wayof describing a situation the situation exemplifiesexternalism, and the assumption that cases in which adifference in the environment of an intentional stateentails a difference in the state's intentional objectare cases in which environmental factors determine thestate's content. Exposing these mistakes leads to seethat the conditions that are required for thetruth of externalism are inconsistent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Burge, T.: 1979, ‘Individualism and the Mental’, in P. A. French, T. E. Vehling Jr., and H. K. Wettstein (eds), Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol 4: Studies in Metaphysics, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 73–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1982:, ‘Other Bodies’, in Woodfield A. (ed.), Thought and Object: Essays on Intentionality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1986, ‘Cartesian Error and the Objectivity of Perception’, in Petit P. and Mc-Dowell J.(eds), Subject, Thought, and Context Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 117–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1988, ‘Individualism and Self-Knowledge’, Journal of Philosophy 85, 649–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M.: 1989, ‘Against Direct Reference’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 13, 205–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt, M.: 1990, ‘Meanings Just Ain't in the Head’, in G. Boolose (ed.), Meaning and Method: Essays in Honor of Hilary Putnam, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K.: 1966, ‘Reference and DefiniteDescriptions’,Philosophical Review 75, 208–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F.: 1995, Naturalizing the Mind,MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1981, ‘The Present Status of the Innateness Controversy’, inhis Representations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1987, Psychosemantics: The Problemof Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1994, The Elm and theExpert, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, A.: 1996, ‘Putnam, Searle, and Externalism’,Philosophical Studies 81, 27–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, H.: forthcoming, ‘Syntax, Semantics, and IntentionalAspects’.

  • Kaplan, D.: 1989, ‘Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, andEpistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals’, in J. Perry and others (eds), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, 481–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.: 1984, ‘Concepts ofSupervenience’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45, 153–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1980,Naming and Necessity, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J.: 1986, ‘Singular Thought and the Extentof Inner Space’, in P. Petit and J. McDowell (eds), Subject, Thought, and Context, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 137–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of ‘Meaning’ ’, in his Mind,Language, reality, (Philosophical Papers, Volume 2), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 215–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1981, Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1983, ‘Computational Psychology and Interpretation Theory’, in his Realism and Reason (Philosophical Papers, Volume 3), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 139–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.:1988, Representation and Reality, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Searle, J.: 1983,Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S.:1983, From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science: The Case Against Belief, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Tye, M.: 1995, Ten Problems of Consciousness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemach, E.:1976, ‘Putnam's Theory on the Reference of Substance Terms’, Journal of Philosophy 73, 216–227. Cambridge, MA U.S.A. E-mail: hjacobs@fas.harvard.edu

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horowitz, A. Contents Just Are In The Head. Erkenntnis 54, 321–344 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010747032196

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010747032196

Keywords

Navigation