Skip to main content
Log in

Defaults with Priorities

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Antonelli, G. A.: A directly cautious theory of defeasible consequence for default logic via the notion of a general extension, Artificial Intelligence 109 (1999), 71–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Apt, K. R., Blair, H. A., and Walker, A.: Towards a theory of declarative knowledge, in Jack Minker (ed.), Foundations of Deductive Databases and Logic Programming, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1988, pp. 89–148.

  3. Baader, F. and Hollunder, B.: Priorities on defaults with prerequisites, and their applications in treating specificity in terminological default logic, Journal of Automated Reasoning 15 (1995), 41–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brewka, G.: Adding priorities and specificity to default logic, in Proceedings of the European Workshop on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA-94), Springer Verlag Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1994, pp. 247–260.

  5. Brewka, G.: Reasoning about priorities in default logic, in Proceedings of the Twelveth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-94), AAAI/MIT, 1994, pp. 940–945.

  6. Brewka, G. and Eiter, T.: Prioritizing default logic, in St. Hölldobler (ed), Intellectics and Computational Logic: Papers in Honor of Wolfgang Bibel, Kluwer, 2000.

  7. Delgrande, J. and Schaub, T.: Expressing preferences in default logic, Artificial Intelligence 123 (2000), 41–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Delgrande, J. and Schaub, T.: The role of default logic in knowledge representation, in J. Minker (ed.), Logic Based Artificial Intelligence, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2000, pp. 107–126.

  9. Delgrande, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., and Wang, K.: A classification and survey of preference handling approaches in nonmonotonic reasoning, Computational Intelligence 20 (2004), 308–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Etherington, D. and Reiter, R.: On inheritance hierarchies with exceptions, in Proceedings of the Third National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-83), 1983, pp. 104–108.

  11. Horty, J.: Moral dilemmas and nonmonotonic logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (1994), 35–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Horty, J.: Some direct theories of nonmonotonic inheritance, in D. Gabbay, C. Hogger, and J. Robinson (eds.), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Volume 3: Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning, Oxford University Press, 1994, pp. 111–187.

  13. Horty, J.: Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning, Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (2001), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Horty, J.: Skepticism and floating conclusions, Artificial Intelligence 135 (2002), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Horty, J.: Reasoning with moral conflicts, Nous 37 (2003), 557–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Horty, J.: Reasons as defaults. Manuscript, 2006.

  17. Horty, J., Thomason, R, and Touretzky, D.: A skeptical theory of inheritance in nonmonotonic semantic networks, Artificial Intelligence 42 (1990), 311–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Makinson, D.: General patterns in nonmonotonic reasoning, in D. Gabbay, C.Hogger, and J. Robinson (eds.), Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, Volume 3: Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Uncertain Reasoning, Oxford University Press, 1994, pp. 35–110.

  19. Makinson, D.: Bridges from Classical to Nonmonotonic Logic. Texts in Computing, Volume 5, King’s College Publications, 2005.

  20. Marek, W. and Truszczyński, M.: Nonmonotonic Logic: Context-dependent Reasoning, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1993.

  21. McDermott, D.: Non-monotonic logic II, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 29 (1982), 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pollock, J.: Cognitive Carpentry: A Blueprint for How to Build a Person, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1995.

  23. Reiter, R.: A logic for default reasoning, Artificial Intelligence 13 (1980), 81–132.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reiter, R. and Criscuolo, G.: On interacting defaults, in Proceedings of the Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-81), 1981, pp. 270–276.

  25. Rintanen, J.: Lexicographic priorities in default logic, Artificial Intelligence 106 (1998), 221–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Touretzky, D.: The Mathematics of Inheritance Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1986.

  27. Touretzky, D., Horty, J., and Thomason, R.: A clash of intuitions: the current state of nonmonotonic multiple inheritance systems, in Proceedings of the Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-87), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1987, pp. 476–482.

  28. Touretzky, D., Thomason, R., and Horty, J.: A skeptic’s menagerie: conflictors, preemptors, reinstaters, and zombies in nonmonotonic inheritance, in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-91), Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1991, pp. 478–483.

  29. van Fraassen, B.: Values and the heart’s command, The Journal of Philosophy 70 (1973), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Horty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Horty, J. Defaults with Priorities. J Philos Logic 36, 367–413 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-006-9040-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-006-9040-0

Keywords

Navigation