Abstract
In this paper, I review Quine's response to the normativity charge against naturalized epistemology. On this charge, Quine's naturalized epistemology neglects the essential normativity of the traditional theory of knowledge and hence cannot count as its successor. According to Quine, normativity is retained in naturalism as ‘the technology of truth-seeking’. I first disambiguate Quine's naturalism into three programs of increasing strength and clarify the strongest program by means of the so-called Epistemic Skinner Box. Then, I investigate two ways in which the appeal to technology as normative enterprise can be made good. I argue that neither coheres with other aspects of Quine's philosophy, most notably the elimination of intentionality. Finally, I briefly consider a third reconstruction of the response, which involves an extension of the web of “belief” to practical know-how. I conclude that the normativity of Quine's (strong) naturalism cannot be found in the technology of truth-seeking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Baker, L. R.: 1995, Explaining Attitudes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Carnap, R.: 1936, ‘Von Erkenntnistheorie zur Wissenschaftslogik’, Actes du 8e Congrès International de Philosophie Scientifique, vol. 1, Hermann, Paris, pp. 36–41.
Davidson, D.: 1986, ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge’, in E. LePore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 307–319.
Dipert, R.: 1993,Artifacts, Art Works, and Agency, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Haack, S.: 1993a, ‘The Two Faces of Quine's Naturalism’, Synthese 94, 335–356.
Haack, S.: 1993b, Evidence and Inquiry, Blackwell, Oxford.
Kim, J.: 1988, ‘What is “naturalized epistemology”?’, in: J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 2, Epistemology, Ridgeview, Atadascero. NORMATIVITY IN QUINE's NATURALISM 267
Laudan, L.: 1987, ‘Progress or Rationality? The Prospects of Normative Naturalism’, American Philosophical Quarterly 24, 19–31.
Millikan, R.: 1993, White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Preston, B.: 1998, ‘Why is aWing Like a Spoon? A Pluralist Theory of Function’, Journal of Philosophy 95, 215–254.
Quine, W. V.: 1960, Word and Object, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Quine, W. V.: 1968, ‘Epistemology Naturalized’, in: Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia UP, New York, 1969, pp. 69–90.
Quine, W. V.: 1969, ‘Natural Kinds’, in: Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia UP, New York, pp. 114–138.
Quine. W. V.: 1973, The Roots of Reference, Open Court, LaSalle.
Quine, W. V.: 1975, ‘Five Milestones of Empiricism’, in: Theories and Things, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 1980, pp. 68–72.
Quine, W. V.: 1978, ‘Postscript on Metaphor’, in: Theories and Things, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 1980, pp. 187–189.
Quine, W. V.: 1980, ‘Things and Their Place in Theories’, in: Theories and Things, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 1980, pp. 1–21.
Quine, W. V.: 1986, ‘Reply to White’, in: L. E. Hahn and P. A. Schilpp (eds.), The Philosophy of W.V. Quine, Open Court, LaSalle, pp. 663–665.
Quine, W. V.: 1990a, Pursuit of Truth, Harvard UP, Cambridge.
Quine, W. V.: 1990b, ‘Reply to Lauener’, in: Barrett and Gibson, Perspectives on Quine, Blackwell, Cambridge, p. 227.
Quine, W. V.: 1993, ‘In Praise of Observation Sentences’, Journal of Philosophy 90, 107–116.
Sosa, E.: 1983, ‘Nature Unmirrored, Epistemology Naturalized’, Synthese 55, 49–72.
Stroud, B.: 1984, The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism, Oxford UP, Oxford. Department of Philosophy Eindhoven University of Technology Den Dolech 2 P.O. Box 513 5600 MB Eindhoven The Netherlands (w.n.houkes@tm.tue.nl)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Houkes, W. Normativity in Quine's Naturalism: The Technology of Truth-Seeking?. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33, 251–267 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022460619303
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022460619303